Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br /> <br />Department of Natural Resources <br /> <br />, 31 3 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (3031 866-3441 <br />fAX: 13031866,4474 <br /> <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />BiUOwens <br />Go~rnor <br /> <br />June 29, 1999 <br /> <br />Greg E. Walcher <br />Executive Director, DNR <br /> <br />Peter H. Evans <br />Director, ewes <br /> <br />Mr. Robert Johnson <br />Regional Director <br />US Bureau of Reclarnation <br />Lower Colorado Region <br />P.O. Box 61470 <br />Boulder City, Nevada 89006-1470 <br /> <br />Attention: Jayne Harkins <br /> <br />Reference: Development of Surplus Criteria for Management of the Colorado River <br />and to Initiate the NEP A Process for the Criteria. <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Johnson <br /> <br />Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on this important Colorado <br />River matter. The Colorado Water Conservation Board was established in 1937 to <br />promote the protection, conservation, and development of Colorado's water resources in <br />order to secure the greatest utilization of those resources for the benefit of present and <br />future inhabitants of the state and to minimize the risk of flood darnage and related <br />economic loss. One of the major objectives within this mission is the protection of <br />Colorado's interstate compact allocations, including those on the Colorado River. <br /> <br />The Bureau of Reclamation's May 13, 1999 Notice ofIntent concerning the <br />development of surplus criteria for managernent of the Colorado River indicates that <br />Reclamation may irnplement surplus criteria by either revising the 1970 Long-Range <br />Operating Criteria or by developing interim implementing criteria pursuant to Article III <br />(3) of the 1970 Long-Range Operating Criteria. <br /> <br />The 1970 Long-Range Operating Criteria includes a provision for storage <br />equalization between Lakes Powell and Mead and can significantly affect the water <br />supply available to the Upper Basin States. Due to that storage equalization provision, a <br />drawdown of Lake Mead for surplus uses by Lower Basin States can result in a <br />proportional loss of storage in Lake Powell. If development of any new criteria for <br />declaration of surplus conditions is appropriate at this time, only interim criteria should <br />