My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00808
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD00808
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:54:12 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:44:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
10/10/1995
Description
Draft Summary Mintues and Record of Decisions - October 10, 1995 Special Meeting
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Harrison: <br /> <br />Kuhn: <br /> <br />Harrison: <br /> <br />Jencsok: <br /> <br />Harrison: <br /> <br />Gimble: <br /> <br />Harrison <br /> <br />T. Right <br /> <br />Harrison: <br /> <br />wording in there that would allow voluntarily a proponent and the Service agreed <br />to it, and everyone did it amicably, it wasn't a forced type of thing, that it would <br />not cause us to take a poison pill, if you know what I mean. I expect that issue <br />will come up along with a number of others in all of our instream flow rights. <br /> <br />Is the base flow right going to raise it the same as recovery right? <br /> <br />I think it will. <br /> <br />Gene? <br /> <br />(Inaudible) <br /> <br />That can be incorporated into these appropriations. Would that be ok? Jennifer? <br /> <br />The other thing with part of your motion being that you won't file statement of <br />opposition so there's a successful source directing the staff to do that, that <br />essentially could be read as a violation of the rules, you may want to consider <br />amending the rule to allow you to do that, I don't have it in front of me right <br />now, but I know some people have made it a requirement.... <br /> <br />Could we sort of hit that back to your court and ask you to take a look at the rules <br />and comment on that before we take final action. If there's some way that we <br />have to word it...T. Right? <br /> <br />(Inaudible comments..no microphone) <br /> <br />The ones who are buying vacant lots, probably. The one's with new homes <br />probably beat us as soon as they got their well permit as part of the deal. OK? <br />(pause) Any further questions on the motion as it stands? Advancing to final, <br />we've got some things to consider. <br /> <br />Inaudible comments <br /> <br />Wells: <br /> <br />Harrison: <br /> <br />Do we file statements of opposition before we have a decree? <br /> <br />I don'[t know if subordinate is the right word for it, but... <br /> <br />Inaudible comments <br /> <br />Wells: <br /> <br />So maybe filing a statement of opposition is different from actually enforcing it <br />then, in other words, you might file a statement of opposition in order to let them <br />know that there's potential...that you're only going to get that with a surface water <br />right anyway, as opposed to a well, and maybe you shouldn't say in advance you <br /> <br />Minutes of October 10, 1995 Special CWCB Meeting <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.