Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Kuhn: <br /> <br />Harrison: <br /> <br />T. Right: <br /> <br />Kuhn: <br /> <br />T. Right: <br /> <br />Kuhn: <br /> <br />Wright: <br /> <br />T. Right: <br /> <br />Kuhn: <br /> <br />Harrison: <br /> <br />T.Right: <br /> <br />Harrison: <br /> <br />OK, I would change that from above the lower terminus of the proposed instream <br />flow right. <br /> <br />OK. Other questions? Questions from the public? Yes, T. Right. <br /> <br />Eric, refresh my memory on current depletions, and what would <br />that...(inaudible)...and current depletions in the basin, Eric, what is that proposed? <br /> <br />The current is about 110, I think its about 112, the additional 52 would take us up <br />to about 165, and then with the additional 72, we're up in the neighborhood of <br />235,000. Essentially, we're... <br /> <br />(Inaudible) <br /> <br />You've got to remember, there's also another increment, and this is very difficult, <br />there's what's called the current baseline, that they looked at, which allows for I <br />guess some additional development, but how that fits in...its roughly 235 to 250. <br />So what we're talking about in terms of people is, you know the additional 50 <br />brought us to 130,000, so we're probably talking about half a million people in <br />rough numbers. <br /> <br />Get the curb and gutter man out to your place. <br /> <br />(very faint) This gives me something to work out later, but you may need to look <br />at what happens with the compact development ceiling is met before the first 52 <br />is developed in the Yampa. If the compact takes over and we lose the <br />seasonability. You may want to adjust down.... <br /> <br />In other words what you're saying is that if the compact reaches full development <br />before we reach the 52, we would potentially have the problem of not having the <br />right to protect the distribution of the hydrograph? <br /> <br />I don't understand. I don't understand the seasonality. What I understand about <br />that is if the compact cuts that off before the instream flow water right cuts it off, <br />you're cut off. Its called priority system, and not having to do with anything to <br />do with a 1995 water right. Now the shape of things at that point, I don't know, <br />except that it will be less than, it will be somehow subsumed inside the envelope, <br />of the 52,000 that we will now define. Its inside there somewhere. <br /> <br />(Indistinct) Do you hold with the compact thing...the only governing stoppage of <br />development is the compact says no timing on the state, you could take it all in <br />October, or something.. <br /> <br />No. Ok. But this water right would still be there, this water right would have a <br /> <br />Minutes of October 10, 1995 Special CWCB Meeting <br />