My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00788
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00788
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:54:05 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:44:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/25/2005
Description
ISF Section - Instream Flow Appropriations - Coal Creek
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Summary <br />The information contained in this report and the associated instream flow file folder forms the <br />basis for staff's instream flow recommendation to be considered by the Board. It is staff's <br />opinion that the information contained in this report is sufficient to support the findings required <br />in Rule 5 i. <br /> <br />Colorado's Instream Flow Program was created in 1973 when the Colorado State Legislature <br />recognized "the need to correlate the activities of mankind with some reasonable preservation of <br />the natural environment" (see 37-92-102 (3) c.R.S.). The statute vests the CWCB with the <br />exclusive authority to appropriate and acquire in stream flow and natural lake level water rights. <br />In order to encourage other entities to participate in Colorado's Instream Flow Program, the <br />statute directs the CWCB to request in stream flow recommendations from other state and federal <br />agencies. The Colorado Division of Wildlife (CDOW) recommended this segment of Coal Creek <br />to the CWCB for inclusion into the Instream Flow Program. Coal Creek is being considered for <br />inclusion into the Instream Flow Program because it has a natural environment that can be <br />preserved to a reasonable degree with an instream flow water right. <br /> <br />The CDOW is forwarding this stream flow recommendation to the CWCB to meet the State of <br />Colorado's policy "... that the wildlife and their environment are to be protected, preserved, <br />enhanced, and managed for the use, benefit, and enjoyment of the people of this state and its <br />visitors ... and that, to carry out such program and policy, there shall be a continuous operation <br />of planning, acquisition, and development of wildlife habitats and facilities for wildlife-related <br />opportunities" (see 33-1-101 (1) c.R.S.). The CDOW Strategic Plan also states "Healthy aquatic <br />environments are essential to maintain healthy and viable fisheries, and critical for self- <br />sustaining populations. The CDOW desires to protect and enhance the quality and quantity of <br />aquatic habitats." <br /> <br />Coal Creek is approximately 16.3 miles long. It begins at the base of Mount Guero at an <br />elevation of approximately 10,500 feet and terminates at the confluence with Anthracite Creek at <br />an elevation of approximately 6420 feet. Of the 4.8-mile segment addressed by this report, <br />approximately 96% of the segment, or 4.6 miles, is located on public lands, while the remainder <br />of the segment, 0.2 miles, is located on private lands. Coal Creek is located within Gunnison <br />County. The total drainage area of the river is approximately 101 square miles. Coal Creek <br />generally flows in a northerly direction. <br /> <br />The subject of this report is a segment of Coal Creek beginning at Little Gunnison Creek and <br />extending downstream to Anthracite Creek. The proposed segment is located west of the Town <br />of Paonia. The staff has received one recommendation for this segment from the CDOW. The <br />recommendation for this segment is discussed below. <br /> <br />Instream Flow Recommendation(s) <br /> <br />The CDOW has recommended 39 cfs, summer, and 21 cfs, winter, based on their data collection <br />efforts (see Table 1 and Appendix A). The modeling results from this survey effort are within <br />the confidence interval produced by the R2Cross model. <br /> <br />-2- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.