My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00767
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00767
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:54:01 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:43:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/23/1977
Description
Agenda, Minutes, Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. VANDEMOER: And then later on you think they will build into camps <br />like the old CCC? <br /> <br />MR. CRANDALL: Yes, We will establish residential centers, and they will <br />work from there on conservation projects. I think we are free to work <br />on the established project areas and maybe state programs that you would <br />like to suggest to us, some public interest activities. <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: Larry, do we have any way to get input into that? <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: Yes. I will touch upon that in my report a little later. <br />We have a state drought council that is making projections and predic- <br />tions. Our computations are that it will take about 125 percent of the <br />long-term average this coming year to get us back into a normal configu- <br />ration on water supply. In other words, the snow-pack would have to be <br />about 125 percent of the long-term average. The chances of this happen- <br />ing are very small. We have a statistical projection on that, too. It <br />is something like a 15 or 20 percent chance of that happening, a very <br />small probability. <br /> <br />All of the federal and state agencies are making projections and keeping <br />close track of the water supplies for next year. The Drought Council <br />has issued various pUblications based upon various assumptions as to <br />what the supply will be next year. The problem is no one really knows. <br /> <br />While Mr. Crandall is here, I do have some questions and a few observa- <br />tions. I have on my desk some inquiries from the Governor's office on <br />several subjects that I am not able to answer at this time. I am not <br />sure that I can ever answer them, but I must try. <br /> <br />First, I want to advise the Board that this afternoon at 1:30 there will <br />be a brief ceremony in the Courthouse here in Cortez, which is not on <br />our agenda. That ceremony will be in the District Court with the <br />District Judge present for the signing of the Dolores contract. We have <br />had to change our dates serveral times on the ground-breaking ceremony <br />for the Dolores Project because we simply did not know whether the proj- <br />ect was going or not. Under the 1956 Act, which authorized the ColoradO <br />River Storage Project, there is a provision which is somewhat unique in <br />reclamation history. This provision requires that, for any project con- <br />structed under the authority of the ColoradO River Storage Project Act, <br />an executed contract must be in existence before construction can start. <br />That Act says that not only must there be an executed contract, but <br />the contract must be executed by an organization which has the authority <br />to levy ad valorem taxes. Obviously, our water conservancy districts in <br />Colorado qualify under the Act. <br /> <br />I met with the Commissioner of Reclamation this past summer to review <br />the contract. proceedings with him. He assured me that we would obtain <br />an executed contract on the Dolores Project any day. That was about the <br /> <br />-9- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.