My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00765
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00765
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:53:59 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:43:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/18/2005
Description
WSP Section - Discussion of RICD Correspondence Regarding RICDs as Works Engineering
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />STATE OF COLORADO <br /> <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br /> <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street Room 721 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) ~1 <br />FAX: (303) 866-4474 <br />www.cwcb.state.co.us <br /> <br /> <br />May 19, 2005 <br /> <br />Bill Owens <br />Governor <br /> <br />Russell George <br />Executive Director <br /> <br />Angeline C. Kinnaird <br />Program Director <br />Board of Licensure For Professional Engineers And Prof. land Surveyors <br />1560 Broadway Suite 1300 <br />Denver Co 80202 <br /> <br />Rod Kuharich <br />CWCB Director <br /> <br />Dan McAuliffe <br />Deputy Director <br /> <br />RE: Requested Review by the Board Regarding the Applicability of Title <br />12 Professions and Occupations Article 25 to the Design and Construction <br />of Whitewater Parks <br /> <br />Dear Ms. Kinnaird and Board members: <br /> <br />As you may know, our Board has certain statutory responsibilities with regard to <br /> <br />Recreational In Channel Diversions ("RICDs"). In the review of several whitewater courses <br /> <br />regarding water rights applications, several questions have arisen. They are as follQ.ws: 1) <br /> <br />whether the design of the structures that create certain whitewater features constitute "the <br /> <br />practice of engineering"; 2) whether these documents should be sealed by an engineer; 3) <br /> <br /> <br />whether the "design" work that has been done in certain instances is substandard; and 4) <br /> <br />whether courses designed and built by non-engineers would be considered the illegal <br /> <br />practice of engineering. <br /> <br />Our effort has included review of potential impacts to the floodplain, the ability of the <br /> <br />structures to control the flow, and information to evaluate the hydraulic performance of the <br /> <br />lltructures at various flow rates. However, there is a lack of conventional engineering <br /> <br />ColoradO Water Conser'l.lion Board <br />Flood Protection. Water Supply Planning and Finance. Stream and Lake Protection <br />Water Supply Protection. Conservation and Drought Planning <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.