My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00754
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00754
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:53:55 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:43:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/25/2005
Description
ISF Section - Instream Flow Appropriations - San Miguel River
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Land Status Review <br /> <br /> Total Length Land Ownership <br />Upper Terminus Lower Terminus (miles) % Private % Public <br />Bear Creek South Fork San 6.4 77% 23% <br />Miguel River <br /> <br />23% of the reach is located on public lands managed by either the USFS or the Town of <br />Telluride and the other 77% of the reach is located on private lands, <br /> <br />Biological and Field Survey Data <br /> <br />The CDOW has conducted field surveys of the fishery resources on this stream and have found a <br />natural environment that can be preserved, As reported in the letter from CDOW to the CWCB <br />"The existence of a natural environment was established by the CWCB in Case Number 4- <br />84CW427, The upper San Miguel River is classified as a medium stream (between 20 to 35 feet <br />wide), Aquatic sampling shows that a self sustaining brook and rainbow trout fishery exists in <br />the upper San Miguel River Basin, In addition to the trout fishery, the upper basin also supports <br />a population of mottled sculpins" (See CDOW Fish Survey in Appendix B), <br /> <br />Field Survey Data <br /> <br />CDOW staff used the R2CROSS methodology to quantify the amount of water required to <br />preserve the natural environment to a reasonable degree, The R2CROSS method requires that <br />stream discharge and channel profile data be collected in a riffle stream habitat type, Riffles are <br />most easily visualized, as the stream habitat types that would dry up first should streamflow <br />cease, This type of hydraulic data collection consists of setting up a transect, surveying the <br />stream channel geometry, and measuring the stream discharge, Appendix B contains copies of <br />field data collected for this proposed segment. <br /> <br />Biological Flow Recommendation <br /> <br />The CWCB staff relied upon the biological expertise of the cooperating agencies to interpret <br />output from the R2CROSS data collected to develop the initial, biologic instream flow <br />recommendation, This initial recommendation is designed to address the unique biologic <br />requirements of each stream without regard to water availability, Three instream flow hydraulic <br />parameters, average depth, percent wetted perimeter, and average velocity are used to develop <br />biologic instream flow recommendations, The CDOW has determined that maintaining these <br />three hydraulic parameters at adequate levels across riffle habitat types, aquatic habitat in pools <br />and runs will also be maintained for most life stages of fish and aquatic invertebrates (Nehring <br />1979; Espegren 1996), <br /> <br />For this segment of stream, seven data sets were collected with the results shown in Table 1 <br />below, Table 1 shows who collected the data (Party), the date the data was collected (Date), the <br />measured discharge at the time of the survey (Q), the accuracy range of the predicted flows <br />based on Manning's Equation (240% and 40% of Q), the summer flow recommendation based <br />on meeting 3 of 3 hydraulic criteria and the winter flow recommendation based upon 2 of 3 <br />hydraulic criteria, <br /> <br />- 3 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.