My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00744
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00744
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:53:49 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:43:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/10/1973
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes, Memos
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~h~ wild r~ve+s qct has som~ restr~ct~ons in it concerning the ownership <br />of land. The act provides that a wild river designation cannot contain <br />more than 320 acres per mile of river, counting both sides of the river. <br />If you distribute it equally, it would be half of that amount on each <br />side of the river. That would never work out exactly that way, but I <br />there is a restriction on the amount of land that can be included within <br />the wild and scenic river areas. There is a further restriction that <br />not more than 100 acres per mile, that's on both sides of the river, or <br />let's say 50 acres on either side of the river per mile, can be acquired <br />in fee title, or by exercising condemnation authority. So there is a <br />limitation then on the amount of private land which can be taken. <br /> <br />The committee determined that about 20 percent of the <br />ownership and the remainder is in federal ownership. <br />be no problem so far concerning the limitation on the <br />private lands. <br /> <br />area was in private <br />There appears to <br />acquisition of <br /> <br />There are no cultivated areas that the committee was able to determine <br />on the Colorado side of the Colorado River in that area. The lower area, <br />the Ruby Canyon area, contains the main line of the DRG Western Railroad. <br />The upper part, the Horsethief Canyon area, is essentially in a primi- <br />tive condition. There are no roads, buildings, or anything of that <br />nature in that area. <br /> <br />This stretch of the river described in the bill appears to qualify in <br />all respects for inclusion under the wild rivers designation. We looked <br />at the area with a particular view of determining whether or not the <br />inclusion of that area would have any significant effect upon the devel- <br />opment of the water resources of the state of Colorado. We concluded <br />that it would not. <br /> <br />(Mr. Sparks used a demonstration map to illustrate this part of his <br />presentation.) <br /> <br />To give you a brief description of the area - starting here on the Colo- <br />rado River near Lorna, there is a little island in the river called <br />Skippers Island. There are professional boat tours which take people on <br />trips down the river and exit near Cisco, Utah. <br /> <br />The bill apparently contains an error. From Skippers Island down here <br />to the Utah state line, is a distance of 22.8 miles. However, the bill <br />gives the distance at 12 1/2 miles. We think there was an error made <br />in the drafting of the bill. The bill only includes the Ruby Canyon <br />area, this lower portion. Horsethief Canyon, which is the really <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />-4- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.