My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00683
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00683
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:53:17 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:42:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/8/1980
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
193
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />36 <br /> <br />CHAIRMAN KROEGER: Tommy Thomson: <br />MR. TOMl1Y THOMPSON: I want to support the <br /> <br /> <br />stipulation, the program that the Board has adopted down <br /> <br /> <br />through the years, because otherwise this Board would be in <br /> <br /> <br />constant litigation with a lot of water districts, including <br /> <br />our own. <br /> <br /> <br />So these stipulations I think are very important. The <br /> <br /> <br />ones that we have entered into have been carefully thought <br /> <br /> <br />out with the Attorney General's office too. You can be sure <br /> <br />of that. You did not supersede ours nor did we supersede <br /> <br /> <br />yours when we worked in harmony. If we don't work on the <br /> <br /> <br />stipulation you're going to be tied up in litigation that <br /> <br /> <br />you won't have enough lawyers to handle it. <br /> <br /> <br />MR. JOHNSTON: I don't have any problem with the <br /> <br />stipulations if you follow the statute, but as far as I'm <br /> <br />concerned, it doesn't follow the statute. It recognizes that <br /> <br /> <br />--,all it does is recognize the preexisting right of a <br /> <br /> <br />senior user and then says without limitation, and the problem <br /> <br /> <br />that I'm having with these languages is that it allows any <br /> <br />kind of exchange uses, <br /> <br />And I'm not really too concerned about the South Platte, <br /> <br />but I'm terribly concerned about these transcontinental <br />diversions and this kind of loose language is that allows <br /> <br />exchanges. <br /> <br />I think the stipulation should be entered into as a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.