My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00683
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00683
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:53:17 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:42:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/8/1980
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
193
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />24 <br /> <br />Platte River in the State of Colorado except for the <br /> <br />possible construction of the Perkins County Canal or the <br /> <br />South Divide Canal which has never been constructed. <br /> <br />It seems to me if the Fish and Wildlife is allowed to <br /> <br />prevail their stand, they've in essence negated that <br /> <br />interstate compact approved by two state legislatures, and <br /> <br />that's possible. And as to the applicability statewide, <br /> <br /> <br />I think all all seven interstate compacts are subject to <br /> <br /> <br />the same kind of attack to whatever whim some biologist <br /> <br /> <br />may come up with in southern California in terms of <br /> <br /> <br />protecting some habitat somewhere. I think that's a <br /> <br />strong threat to the interstate compacts. <br /> <br /> <br />Secondly, I think perhaps the Board needs to know a <br /> <br />little bit more background than the physical situation. <br /> <br /> <br />Riverside Irrigation District in conjunction with Public <br /> <br /> <br />Service Company of Colorado, two private entities. No <br /> <br /> <br />federal funding involved whatsoever in construction of the <br /> <br /> <br />Wildcat Reservoir. <br /> <br />It's an off-channel reservoir, proposed to construct it <br /> <br />basically for supplemental irrigation water as well as <br /> <br />cooling water to the pond and power plant. The site is <br /> <br />approximately ten miles from the South Platte River. It's <br /> <br />on a dry stream. <br /> <br />And it seems to me we want to look closely at what <br /> <br />Section 404 in the water act really requires or permits the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.