Laserfiche WebLink
<br />: <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Executive Session, continued <br /> <br />4. Call to Order (11:15 a.m.) <br /> <br />The special meeting of the Colorado Water Conservation Board was reconvened on <br />Thursday, August 6, 1992 in Room 719, State Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman <br />Street, Denver, Colorado. Chairman Martineau called the meeting back to order at <br />11:15 a.m. and there was a quorum. Present were Salazar, Harrison, Smith, Jackson, <br />Martineau, Sheftel, Eisel, Lochhead, Wright, Meyring, Simpson, and Jencsok. Patricia <br />Bangert, AG's office, represented Gale Norton. Olson was absent. <br /> <br />Sa. Colorado Water Resources and Power Development Authority, Granby Intake <br />Rehabilitation Approval. (11:15 - 11:19 a.m.) <br /> <br />Dan Merriman, CWCB staff, introduced a project to be funded by the CWR&PDA to <br />rehabilitate a raw water intake for Granby and reviewed the staff recommendation to <br />notify the Authority that the proposed project will not adversely affect instream flow <br />rights or Colorado's compact entitlement. A motion was made by Jackson and <br />seconded by Harrison to adopt the staff recommendation. The motion passed by <br />unanimous (10-0) decision. <br /> <br />5b. Colorado Water Resources and Power Development AuthOrity, Inundation Caused by <br />Fish Creek Reservoir Enlargement. (11:19 - 11:28 a.m.) <br /> <br />Dan Merriman reviewed a CWR&PDA funded project for the enlargement of Fish <br />Creek reservoir and the staff recommendation to direct the staff to work with the <br />applicant and the Forest Service to address any concerns regarding the inundation of <br />the Board's instream flow water rights. Any decisions regarding the protection of the <br />Board's instream flow water rights, however, rest solely with the Board. The staff will <br />advise the Board and the Authority of any court actions taken with respect to the new <br />water storage right application. Questions were asked by Jackson, Harrison, Smith, <br />and Eisel. Answers were provided by Merriman and Dan Law, Director of the <br />CWR&PDA A motion was made by Smith and seconded by Jackson to adopt the <br />staff recommendation. The motion passed by unanimous (10-0) decision. <br /> <br />Added Item. Instream Flow Program: Stipulation/Authorization to Proceed to Trial, <br />Case No. 1.90CW051, Pherson (11:28. 11:33 a.m.) <br /> <br />Dan Merriman reviewed the subject case on South Boulder Creek. Peter Fahmy, AG's <br />staff, reported on the status of discussions with the applicant, the need for a staff gage, <br />and requested authorization to settle on the basis of the stipulation or go to trial if <br />necessary. Questions were asked by Harrison. A motion was made by Harrison and <br />seconded by Eisel to adopt the staff recommendation. The motion passed by <br />unanimous (10-0) decision. <br /> <br />August 1992 Meeting, page 3 <br />