Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />-t=-l c- ~ <br /> <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br /> <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br /> <br />Department ofNatoral Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 721 <br />Denver> Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3441 <br />FAX: (303) 866-4474 <br />www.cwcb.state.co.us <br /> <br />'tR CONSr <br />'i-\' -R[.. <br />le~\ <br /> <br />:::. .: ~ <br />~ -._~,..,,-- i}' <br /> <br />I ~ .. . t <br />'1']'1"/ . <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />Bill Owens <br />Governor <br /> <br />Russell George <br />Executive Director <br /> <br />To: <br /> <br />Instream Flow Subcommittee Members <br /> <br />Rod Kuharich <br />CWCB Director <br /> <br />From: <br /> <br />CWCB Instream Flow Subcommittee Members <br />Barbara Biggs, Keith Catlin, Eric Wilkinson, John Redifer, Don <br />Schwindt, Tom Sharp, Rod Kuharich, Harold Miskel <br /> <br />Rick Brown <br />Acting Deputy Director <br /> <br />Date: <br /> <br />March 21, 2006 <br /> <br />Subject: <br /> <br />Basin-oriented approach for New ISF Appropriations <br /> <br />Background <br /> <br />At the January 2006 Board Meeting, the Subcommittee discussed a proposed basin- <br />oriented approach for considering ISF recommendations and directed staff to develop a set of <br />criteria for considering "exceptions" to the proposed rotation schedule or the new timeline. The <br />rotation schedule and criteria were discussed with Board members and the public at the February <br />ISF Workshop and finalized at the March 21, 2006 subcommittee meeting. <br /> <br />Basin Rotation <br /> <br />Recommending entities currently propose streams for appropriation based on their own <br />internal prioritization criteria. As a result, streams may be recommended in multiple water <br />divisions in any given year. This approach can introduce some inefficiency into the instream <br />flow appropriation process. Public involvement is critical to the appropriation process, but <br />under the current process staff is required to address concerns across multiple water divisions, <br />with multiple Board members, division engineers, water commissioners and other stakeholders_ <br />In addition, there is no guarantee that once issues are addressed in a given water division, that the <br />recommending entities won't be back the following year recommending other streams in the <br />same or adjacent basins, which could involve the same stakeholders. To increase efficiency for <br />all involved parties, and provide some certainty to the stakeholders, the subcommittee requested <br />that staff develop a rotating basin-oriented approach to recommending new isntream flow <br />appropriations. <br /> <br />A rigid basin-by-basin rotation approach is not without problems. For example, <br />recommending entities such as the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) may need to focus their <br /> <br />Flood Protection. Water Supply Planning and Finance. Stream and Lake Protection <br />Water Supply Protection. ConsetVation and Drought Planning <br />