My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00670
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00670
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:53:06 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:42:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/26/2001
Description
WSP Section - Colorado River Basin Issues - Delta and Inadvertent Overrun Accounting Policy Resolutions
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />, <br />, <br /> <br />-2- <br /> <br />January 2, 2001 <br /> <br />"We also talked about the respective roles of the federal government and <br />the states in solving the next generation of management and reallocation <br />problems. And what are those rules goirig to be? And has the time, like <br />we've just discussed this morning, arrive~ for a seven state commission? <br />Those discussions will continue." Symposium Proceedings, p. 136. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />These same realities brought representatives of the Seven Colorado River basin <br />states together in discussions throughout 1999, and 2000 on the subject of bringing <br />California's Colorado River water use within it~ 4.4 million acre foot annual allotmen,t. <br />This discussion resuhed in the proposal for Inte~im Surplus Guidelines. The process by <br />which that seven state consensus was reached ~ based in large measure on the personal <br />relationships of the particular individuals involved and was accomplished without the <br />benefit of any institutionalized form, forum or prpcess. Without such institutionalization, <br />however, the outcome of that process was hortatory only. Although persuasive because <br />of the unanimity of position of the seven Colorado River basin states, and because of the <br />uniqueness of that unanimity, it carried no weight as a governmental act or decision. <br />Thus, the question presented initially above becOmes important. The final action of the <br />Secretary of the Interior adopting interim surplus guidelines did not completely <br />incorporate the seven state consensus. More work between the states will have to be <br />done. <br /> <br />In order to keep conversation alive on this important question, the Water Division <br />of the Colorado River Commission plans to host and sponsor a two-day conference on the . <br />topic "Issues of Governance of the Colorado River System." The conference will be <br />conducted in conjunction with the University of Nevada Las Vegas,' Greenspun School of <br />Urban Affairs. Graduate Program in EnvironmetJtal Studies. We would like your help in <br />defining the substantive scope of the issues to be; raised at the conference. The conference <br />is tentatively planned to be held at :facilities at the University of Nevada Las Vegas, during <br />week of September 24,2001. . <br /> <br />If you are willing to help in conferenqe planning, or would like to designate <br />someone from your staff in your stead, pleast contact Donna Bloom of High Sierra <br />Conferences Services (775-626-6389), with whrlm the Commission's Water Division has <br />contracted to provide logistical support for the ~onference, to discuss your availability. A <br />copy of the planning committee invitation list id enclosed.. We would like to organize an <br />initial meeting of the conference planning commi~ee in Las Vegas some time in January. <br /> <br /> <br />/- <br /> <br />Enclosure <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.