My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board Meeting 03/17/1980
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
Board Meeting 03/17/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:52:41 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:41:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/17/1980
Description
Agenda and Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />COLORADO WATER CONSERVATION BOARD <br />823 State Centennial Building <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br /> <br />March 11, 1980 <br /> <br />M E M 0 RAN DUM <br /> <br />TO: Representative Walt Younglund <br /> <br />FROM: Bill McDonald <br /> <br />SUBJECT: H.B. 1039 and H.B. l040 <br /> <br />You have asked that I determine whether the funding which <br />these two bills would make available to the Board's construction fund <br />can be used in a timely manner. <br /> <br />1. We can spend no more money in FY 80-81 than can be committed to <br />previously authorized projects or to projects to be authorized <br />this session by S.B. 67. This amounts to $15-16 million. For <br />FY 80-81, we already have this much money ($10 million from <br />S.B. 537, $2 million from FY 80-81 mineral leasing act revenues, <br />and $3.6 million carry-over of unexpended funds from FY 79-80). <br />Thus, both bills need to be amended in such a way that they do <br />not appropriate money to the construction fund until FY 81-82. <br /> <br />2. We estimate that we could spend about $20-25 million in FY 81-82 <br />based upon the applications which we now have in hand (see attached <br />table). We are limited to this amount for FY 81-82 since we must <br />finish feasibility studies by NOv., 1980, in order to present proj- <br />ects to the legislature for authorization in January, 1981. Thus, <br />any applications received later this calendar year cannot be <br />readied for legislative consideration until January, 1982 (for <br />initiation of construction in FY 82-83). <br /> <br />3. By FY 82-83, enough feasibility studies could be completed to <br />initiate construction with just about any amount of funding which <br />the legislature may provide. ~is is simply because we will have <br />enough lead time between now and then, if we know that money is <br />coming, to initiate the necessa~ engineering studies. <br /> <br />4. A further problem we face is that 37-60-122(1) (c) limits our <br />expenditures for feasibility studies to $150,000 per fiscal year. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.