My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00632
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00632
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:52:37 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:41:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
8/16/1972
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes, Memos
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />presents the quality of water existing in the aquifer at that point <br />and time. You can see within the small area that it actually is <br />a very complex pattern of dissolved solids concentrations. We <br />observe very marked changes in water quality over a very short dis- <br />tance. For example, beneath the canal in the central part of the I <br />study area we have dissolved solids of less than 1,000 parts per <br />million or mg/l, and this increases to over 3,500 milligrams per <br />liter in a distance of less than one mile. The water quality pattern <br />itself appears to be a function of several factors, but the major ones <br />appear to be the location of areas of heaviest irrigation which would <br />be this area east of La Junta, and also the direction of ground water <br />flow indicated by some of these arrows, which are perpendicular to <br />the water table contours. The position of the river itself also <br />appears to play some role in the water quality pattern observed with- <br />in the study area. <br /> <br />(Slide) Now, if you will remember on the flow chart, I showed you the <br />first step in the actual calculations was to determine the new water <br />table elevations. In the model that we are using, a working and <br />satisfactory hydrologic model is a prerequisite to the water quality <br />model. One measure of how good our hydrologic model is, is to <br />compare the observed and calculated water table elevation for the end <br />of the study period. That is, after a period of one year has elapsed. <br />So from March I, 1972, you can see that the water table contours, the <br />water table elevations measured in the field, shown in blue, compared <br />quite well with those calculated by the computer model. We were <br />able to predict the observed water table elevations throughout the <br />aquifer within half a foot approximately 90 percent of the time. <br />(Slide) Since we ran the model on a monthly basis, we were able to <br />compare, or look at changes in water table elevations as a function <br />of time. This slide shows you a comparison of observed and calculated <br />water table elevations for one observation point in the aquifer or <br />in the study area. And again, you see that the model is predicting <br />the trends and the changes which were observed in the field. <br /> <br />(Slide) What we are really interested in - the purpose of the study <br />was to look at the quality of water in the aquifer. This map shows <br />you first of all the actual dissolved solids concentration which was <br />observed in the study area after a period of one year. The water <br />quality pattern is indicated again by these contour lines and you see <br />that the shape of the pattern, or the pattern itself, is fairly <br />similar to what it was a year ago, that is, in 1971, but it is not a <br />static pattern. It is changing and there are differences, noticeable <br />differences, between '71 and '72. What I did was to shade in either <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />-25- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.