My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board Meeting 11/03/1983
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
Board Meeting 11/03/1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:52:33 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:41:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
11/3/1983
Description
Agenda, Minutes, Memos
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />cost of replacement and the fact that Section 205 of <br />the Colorado River .Basin Salinity Control Act provides <br />that these costs are to be borne by the federal <br />government and Upper and Lower Basin power users. <br /> <br />Mr. Johnston moved and Mr. Furneaux seconded that <br />the cost of replacement for salinity control features <br />shall not be a local obligation. The motion passed <br />unanimously. <br /> <br />b. <br /> <br />Organization of laterals, Grand Valley Project <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. McDonald explained that the majority of the 700 <br />private lateral systems in the Grand Valley area are <br />private and currently unorganized and present a <br />contractual problem for the Bureau of Reclamation. The <br />Bureau of Reclamation is required to contract with a <br />responsible entity for the continued operation and <br />maintenance of the private laterals once they have been <br />lined or replaced with pipe. In order to expedite the <br />process and circumvent the formal organization of these <br />laterals, the Bureau has asked the Board to assume the <br />responsibility for the operation and maintenance of these <br />laterals. Mr. McDonald discussed several possible <br />organizations including water user associations, <br />irrigation districts, water conservancy districts, and <br />water conservation districts. After some discussion of <br />this topic it was generally felt that the State does not <br />have the resources to this; that it is a salinity control <br />program expense; and that it should be addressed in the <br />proposed legislation amending the Salinity Control Act. <br /> <br />Mr. Johnston requested that the staff investigate <br />the possibility of a soil conservation district <br />handling this operation and maintenance responsibility. <br /> <br />c. Glenwood-Dotsero Springs and Paradox Valley water <br />rights <br /> <br />Mr. McDonald briefly described the plans for each <br />project and the water rights proceedings involved. <br /> <br />Mr. Robbins moved and Mr. Johnston seconded that <br />the Board adjourn and convene into Executive Session to <br />discuss the legal issues involved with these projects. <br /> <br />Mr. Vandemoer recessed the general session at 12:30 <br />p.m. for the executive session during the lunch hour. <br /> <br />Paradox <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. McDonald and Wendy Weiss explained the issues discussed at <br />the executive session which centered on the due diligence <br /> <br />-21- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.