My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board Meeting 11/03/1983
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
Board Meeting 11/03/1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:52:33 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:41:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
11/3/1983
Description
Agenda, Minutes, Memos
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Greene: <br /> <br />Maybe, but flows given are our best available <br />data to date. The 90-day clock we operate on <br />under section 7 doesn't stop though. A <br />jeopardy opinion would be forthcoming if the <br />reports weren't completed. <br /> <br />Decreasing populations could be caused by a <br />variety of conditions of which flow might be <br />only one. <br /> <br />Mr. Robbins: What is the impact of the endangered species <br />upon the sport fisheries? <br /> <br />Mr. Greene: Question has not been totally addressed. <br /> <br />Mr. Vandemoer: Wants the minimum flows in the draft stated as <br />preliminary, temporary or sUbject to revision. <br /> <br />Mr. Robbins: Requests that McDonald formally respond to the <br />U.S. Fish and wildlife Service based upon the <br />discussion, comments, and forthcoming commets. <br /> <br />Mr. Lochhead: <br /> <br />Motion: <br />Fish and <br />that the <br />studies. <br /> <br />transmitted to U.S. <br />along with a request <br />involved in these <br /> <br />That comments be <br />wildlife Service <br />state be heavily <br /> <br />Seconded by Mr. Jackson. <br /> <br />Motion approved. <br /> <br />Agenda Item 16 - Proposed Four Corners Water Management Study <br /> <br />At Chairman Vandemoer's request, Mr. McDonald briefly <br />discussed this item, stating that the Bureau of Reclamation had <br />proposed this study which was described in his September 2, 1983 <br />memorandum to the Board members. In its proposal the Bureau <br />would address water quality and quantity of surface and <br />groundwater in the San Juan and Dolores River Basins. He <br />suggested that in its deliberations of this proposal the Board <br />should consider three issues, namely: <br /> <br />(1) The Board's decision should be responsive to the desires <br />of local residents. <br /> <br />(2) The study should assess the needs as defined by local <br />interests. <br /> <br />(3) The Board not seek funds to cost-share the study. <br /> <br />In response to the Chairman's request for comments, Mr. <br />Kroeger indicated strong local interest in the study, and that <br /> <br />-13- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.