Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Agenda Item 21e <br />July 24-25, 2000 Board Meeting <br />Page 2 00 <br /> <br />.;...~ <br />'''11 <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />The decision on whether or not to declare a surplus for calendar year 2001 has been <br />delayed until the August 16,2000 meeting of Colorado River Management Workgroup. <br />The reasons for delaying the decision are: <br />I. The R70 criteria historically used to make this determination will not likely <br />result in a surplus declaration in 2001. <br />2. The Colorado River Management Workgroup would like additional time to <br />see what the actual runoff into the reservoirs will be and to get some sense of <br />what the summer monsoons might contribute in the way of reservoir inflow. <br />3. The Colorado River Management Workgroup would like to see if the seven <br />basin states, the Bureau of Reclamation and others can reach agreement on <br />interim surplus criteria that would allow for a surplus declaration in 200 I. <br /> <br />If interim surplus criteria were adopted as presently proposed, a "Full Domestic Surplus" <br />would be declared in 2001 based on the Lake Mead content being above elevation 1145. <br />If interim surplus criteria are not adopted or runoff is not sufficient to declare a surplus <br />under the R70 strategy presently used and agreed to, the Secretary ofInterior will still be <br />faced with a very difficult decision. <br /> <br />Even absent interim surplus criteria or improved runoff conditions, in my estimation it <br />will still be very difficult for the Secretary of the Interior not to declare a surplus in 200 I <br />for the following reasons. <br />I. There is a need for additional water in the lower basin of approximately <br />700,000 AF, of which 450,000 AF is needed to keep MWD's Colorado River <br />Aqueduct full. <br />2. The reservoirs are relatively full and given average inflow in 200 I Lake <br />Powell will need to equalize with Lake Mead. Releases from Powell are <br />presently estimated to be 9.450 MAF in WY 2001 with average inflow. <br />3. Based on existing conditions and historic record, there is around a 30% <br />chance of a flood control release from Lake Mead above downstream <br />requirements sometime during calendar year 200 I. <br />4. Any January 1,2001 inflow forecast of 120% or greater should start triggering <br />flood control releases above downstream requirements and approximately <br />125% of average will require a 19,000 cfs release for the month of January <br />2001. <br />5. Given present uses and reservoir storage, there is little increased risk of <br />shortages with or without declaring a surplus of 700,000 AF or less in WY <br />2001. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Attached is a portion of the July, 2000 24-month study for your reference. <br /> <br />e <br />