Laserfiche WebLink
<br />WQS-ANPRM Comment Clerk <br />November 21, 1998 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />levels in Colorado demonstrates the extent to which site-specific circumstances and <br /> <br /> <br />flexible programmatic capabilities are required to balance interests in the health of our <br /> <br /> <br />lakes, rivers and streams with our interest in healthy economies and communities. <br /> <br />The CWCB is also concerned by the potential conflict between many other <br />aspects ofEPA's ANPRM and Colorado's ability to continue developing its interstate <br />water supply allocations and to protect existing water supplies and property rights. Many <br />of the suggested changes in the antidegradation policy and the use attainability analysis, <br />the potential refinements of the "existing use" and "designated use" concepts, the <br />potential new guidance on "use removal criteria" and mixing zone determinations, the <br />proposed refmement or development of many new criteria (for toxicity, sediment quality, <br />human and wildlife health, microbial and nutrient levels, etc.) and the suggested <br />"independent application" policy raise many questions that we are not presently prepared <br />to evaluate in this abstract context. Although the questions EP A poses in the ANPRM <br />will be helpful in framing your proposed "structured national debate," these questions are <br />very complex. The CWCB will coordinate with the WQCC and the many potentially <br />affected communities, businesses and other Colorado interests to better understand the <br />implications ofEPA's proposals. Our experience suggests, however, that state and local <br />agencies will require adequate time and flexibility to address site-specific circumstances <br />while we evaluate the opportunities for protecting new needs along with existing rights <br />and values. EP A should allow enough time and provide adequate information for states <br />such as Colorado to appropriately deal with the many complex and potentially significant <br />regulatory options. <br /> <br />We appreciate the advance notice EP A has provided the state of Colorado and <br />others concerning potential changes in the national water quality protection policies and <br />pledge our continued support for a rational and timely evaluation of these issues. Please <br />call or write to us if you want clarification of the Colorado Water Conservation Board's <br />interests and concerns and please keep us informed regarding any next steps. <br /> <br />L:/boardmen/nov98120attach draftEPAcomments ANPRM Nov98 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />