My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00563
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00563
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:51:58 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:40:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/22/2005
Description
Report of the Attorney General
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />1 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />",. <br /> <br />JOHNW. SUTHERS <br />Attorney General <br /> <br />CYNTHIA S. HONSSINGER <br />Chief Deputy Attorney <br />General <br /> <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DEPARTMENT OF LAW <br /> <br />STATE SERVICES <br />BmLDING <br />1525 Sherman Street - 5th <br />Floor <br />Denver~ Colorado 80203 <br />Phone 303) 866-4500 <br />FAX 303) 866-5691 <br /> <br />OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL <br /> <br />JOHN J. KRAUSE <br />Interim Solicitor General <br /> <br />March 14,2005 <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />John Suthers <br />Attorney General <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Carol Angel <br />First Assistant Attorney General <br /> <br />Pat Kowaleski <br />First Assistant Attorney General <br /> <br />RE: Report of the Attorney Generall <br /> <br />1. Forest Service Reserved Riehts Cases, Case Nos. W-1146-73 et a!.. Water Division 7. <br />Another status report is due to the court on June 15,2005. <br /> <br />2. Kansas v. Colorado. United States Supreme Court. No. 105. Ori!!inal. <br /> <br />On December 7 the United States Supreme Court denied all of Kansas' exceptions to the <br />Fourth Report of the Special Master. The Court did not accept Kansas' new argument <br />regarding calculation of prejudgment interest on damages. In addition, the Court rejected <br />Kansas' request for a river master, its objection to ten-year running averages in the use of the <br />model, and its other objections to various aspects of the model. At a status conference on <br />February 4, the Special Master rnade it very clear that he is going to require that the States <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />I Text concerning previously reported matters will usually contain only information on recent developments rather <br />than repeating background information. Material to which we wish to caU special attention appears in bold italics, <br />and any entirely new matters are specificaUy identified as INEWl. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.