Laserfiche WebLink
<br />" <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />\ <br />. <br /> <br />IM"..r. <br />. ,k ' <br /> <br />I: :1:'1 ~ <br />I>",e <br /> <br />3-21-06 <br />MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING <br /> <br />r" _ ro ~ ~, ... ,.... ...T..... .. ,..,.......,.......6'0 ...... T. T"O... _" _ __ .... <br />Fur .:)t::lUt::UU::IU Ul '--',,~~ l~U. U'tL ",. .1..~, n au:.- I.I'Vl~lUII .. <br />(Chaffee County Recreational In-Channel Diversion) <br /> <br />This MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ("MOU") is entered into by and among <br />Chaffee County; Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District ("Southeastern"); the <br />Colorado Department of Natural Resources ("CDNR"); Colorado Division of Wildlife <br />("CDOW"); Colorado Division of Parks and Outdoor Recreation ("DPOR"); Upper Arkansas <br />Water Conservancy District ("Upper Arkansas"); City of Salida ("Salida"); Arkansas River <br />Outfitters Association ("AROA"); Colorado Springs Utilities ("CS-U"); the Board of Water <br />Works of Pueblo, Colorado ("BWWP"); Pueblo West Metropolitan District ("Pueblo West"); <br />and Lower Arkansas Valley Water Conservancy District ("Lower Arkansas") (together referred <br />to as the "Parties"), effective this _ day of March, 2005. <br /> <br />Exvlanatorv Recitals <br /> <br />A. Chaffee County filed an application for recreational in-channel diversion water <br />rights ("RICD") for boating parks located in the City of Salida and Town of Buena Vista <br />("Boating Parks"), Case No. 04CW129, Water Division 2, in December 2004 (THE "RICD <br />CASE"). SOUTHEASTERN, CDNR, CD OW, DPOR, UPPER ARKANSAS, SALIDA, AROA, CS-U, <br />BWWP, and Pueblo West (the "Objectors"), among others, filed statements of opposition in the <br />RICD Case. <br /> <br />B. The Colorado Water Conservation Board ("CWCB") held a hearing on May 23, <br />2005 on the RICD Case (the "CWCB Hearing"). In setting this hearing, the CWCB declined a <br />request of Chaffee County, supported by Southeastern and other Parties, to postpone the CWCB <br />Hearing. On May 24, 2005, the CWCB postponed making findings on the RICD until <br />September, 2005, and invited the Parties to submit any settlement agreement for the CWCB's <br />consideration by September 2,2005. Thereafter, the CWCB requested and was granted by the <br />Water Court additional extensions of time in which to submit its findings in order to allow the <br />Parties time to reach a settlement. The last extension of time gave the CWCB until April 14, <br />2006 to submit its findings to the Water Court. <br /> <br />C. The Parties acknowledge that the CWCB and the Division of Water Resources <br />("DWR") are not parties to this Agreement and that CDNR's participation in this Agreement <br />does not bind the CWCB or the DWR in any respect. <br /> <br />D. For each of the past fifteen years, CDNR (on behalf of CDOW and DPOR) and <br />Southeastem have agreed annually, together with the United States Department of Interior, <br />Bureau of Reclamation ("Reclamation"), to operation of a voluntary flow management program <br />whereby Reclamation operates Twin Lakes and Turquoise Reservoirs so as to manage flows in <br />the Arkansas River above Pueblo Reservoir for recreational and fishery purposes, while fully <br />satisfying the primary purposes of the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project and other existing contractual <br /> <br />SB2341 <br />