BOARD00543 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Case No. 5-80CW116 5-80CW118 5-80CW124 Stream Gypsum Creek Abrams Creek Eagle River Amount (cfs) .5 . 6.0 130/50 Appropriation Date 3/17/1980 3/17/1980 3/17/1980 Staff, in cooperation with the Attorney General's Office, h~ negotiated a settlement that fully protects the . Board's instream flow water rights. The Board holds the following instream flow rights, which could have been injured by this application: The Applicant has agreed to the following terms and conditions that are fully protective of the CWCB's instream flow water rights: . The Applicant withdrew the augmentation plan P9rtion ofits application. . The Applicant agreed not to divert its new junio~ surface water rights, new junior storage right, or new junior exchange, at times when the CWCB's intervening instream flow water rights were not satisfied. (3) Case No. 1-OlCW161; Village at Elk Crossing, LLC The Board ratified the statement of opposition filcid in this case at its January 2002 meeting. The , ... Board's main objective in filing.a statement of opposition in this case was to assure that the Applicant _ replaced its depletions in the same time, place, and amoutit at which they occur. The Staff, in cooperation with the Attorney General's Office, has negotiated a settlement that fully protects the Board's instream flow water rights. . The Board holds the following instream flow rights, which could have been injured by this application: Case No. 1-94CW250 Stream North Turkey Creek Amount (cl's) 3/.75 ' Appropriation Date 11/3/1994 The Applicant has agreed to the following terms and conditions that are fully protective of the CWCB's instream flow water rights: . At times when the CWCB's instream flow water right on North Turkey Creek is not being satisfied, Applicant will curtail its junior diversilms or provide water in an amount equal to the depletions, in the same time and location where Ihose depletions impact the river system. . The Applicant also has agreed to install, maintaip, and monitor such measuring devices as may be required by the State and Division engineer to administer the terms ofthe decree. (4) Case No. 4-02CW1l8; Lake City Ranches The Board ratified the statement of opposition filed in this case at its March 2002 meeting. The e . Board's main objective in filing a statement of oppositiort in this case was to assure that the Applicant did not divert its changed water rights at an upstream poipt of diversion when the CWCB's intervening