My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00543
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00543
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:51:41 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:40:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/28/2003
Description
CWCB Director's Report
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />and signed by the states' respective governors and attorneys general in December 2002. <br /> <br />Request for Funds Withdrawn: In May we had received a request from GASP for emergency <br />drought relief funds to address augmentation issues. Because reservoirs filled, GASP has withdrawn its <br />request. <br /> <br /> <br />Rio Grande Basin <br /> <br />Rio Grande Silvery Minnow v. Keys: Fallout continues from the ruling of the three judge panel of the <br />10th Circuit Court of Appeals on June 12 regarding water releases for the silvery minnow. The 10th <br />Circuit panel upheld an earlier district court decision directing Reclamation to reduce its contracted <br />water deliveries to provide additional water for the protection of the silvery minnow, an endangered <br />species listed under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The court broadly construed the discretionary <br />authority of Reclamation to reduce water deliveries in favor of endangered species pro,tection. It also <br />concluded that the ESA's requirement that federal agencies conserve species and avoid jeopardy gives <br />agencies the ability to modify existing government contracts absent an unmistakable waiver of <br />sovereignty by the federal government. <br /> <br />On June 17 Secretary of the Interior Gale Norton and New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson met to <br />discuss issues relating to the decision. Following the meeting, Secretary Norton issued the following <br />statement: <br /> <br />"The 10th Circuit opinion represents a significant setback for collaborative efforts and it makes a <br />difficuIt situation more challenging. <br /> <br />"The 2003 Biological Opinion we are operating under is a good plan. It allows portions of the river to <br />dry up while putting in place important steppingstones for long term recovery of the minnow. Simply <br />put, the biological opinion is our best opportunity to solve the challenging water supply situation <br />facing the people of the Middle Rio Grande Basin as well as the silvery minnow. <br /> <br />"My department remains committed to doing everything possible to stretch limited water resources <br />during this extreme drought year while complying with the law to protect the minnow. We will <br />continue to work diligently New Mexico and the congressional delegation to find a dependable and <br />lasting water supply for the people and Middle Rio Grande enviromnent. <br /> <br />"I appreciate Governor Richardson's continuing interest in working with this Administration to find <br />solutions to these difficult issues. I also applaud his effol'ls to secure credit water agreements, which <br />are of strong importance to everyone's efforts to address this very difficult water supply situation." <br /> <br />U.S. Senator Pete Domenici (R-NM) has also announced his intention to introduce legislation that <br />would reverse the effects of this ruling. <br /> <br />According to a news release of Senator Domenici on June 20, the proposed legislation would: (I) <br />prevent enforcement of the 10th Circuit Court panel decision by decreeing that habitat requirements for <br />the silvery minnow have been met based upon the March 2003 Biological Opinion issued by the U.S. <br />Fish and Wildlife Service; (2) legislate that the San Juan-Chama project and the Middle Rio Grande <br />project water contracts supersede the ESA; (3) limit Reclamation's use of funds to implement changes <br />to Rio Grande water contracts; (4) prohibit the use of inter-basin water transfers (San Juan-Chama <br />water) to meet ESA requirements; and, (5) allow for the federal purchase of privately held water if <br />there is a willing seller. <br /> <br />In its June 12 decision, the U.S. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed 2-1 a district court decision <br />which held that the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) "...retains sufficient discretion over its river <br />management and operations in the middle Rio Grande...to require BOR to consult... under Section <br />24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.