My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00529
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00529
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:51:31 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:39:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
10/10/1995
Description
Special Meeting Minutes - October 10, 1995
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Harrison: <br /> <br />Kuhn: <br /> <br />Harrison: <br /> <br />J encsok: <br /> <br />Harrison: <br /> <br />Gimble: <br /> <br />Harrison <br /> <br />T.Right <br /> <br />Harrison: <br /> <br />know what I mean. I expect that issue will come up along with a number of others in <br />all of our instream flow rights. <br /> <br />Is the base flow right going to raise it the same as recovery right? <br /> <br />I think it will. <br /> <br />Gene? <br /> <br />(Inaudible) <br /> <br />That can be incorporated into these appropriations. Would that be ok? Jennifer? <br /> <br />The other thing with part of your motion being that you won't file statement of <br />opposition so there's a successful source directing the staff to do that, that essentially <br />could be read as a violation of the rules, you may want to consider amending the rule <br />to allow you to do that, I don't have it in front of me right now, but I know some <br />people have made it a requirement.... <br /> <br />Could we sort of hit that back to your court and ask you to take a look at the rules <br />and comment on that before we take final action. If there's some way that we have to <br />word it...T. Right? <br /> <br />(Inaudible comments..no microphone) <br /> <br />The ones who are buying vacant lots, probably. The one's with new homes probably <br />beat us as soon as they got their well permit as part of the deal. OK? (pause) Any <br />further questions on the motion as it stands? Advancing to final, we've got some <br />things to consider. <br /> <br />Inaudible comments <br /> <br />Wells: <br /> <br />Harrison: <br /> <br />Do we file statements of opposition before we have a decree? <br /> <br />I don'[t know if subordinate is the right word for it, but... <br /> <br />Inaudible comments <br /> <br />Wells: <br /> <br />So maybe filing a statement of opposition is different from actually enforcing it then, <br />in other words, you might file a statement of opposition in order to let them know <br />that there's potential...that you're only going to get that with a surface water right <br />anyway, as opposed to a well, and maybe you shouldn't say in advance you shouldn't <br />file a statement of opposition, _- to Jennifer's thing, but what you want to do in <br />that case is to say this is to let you be aware that there is a base flow issue and you <br />may have to augment at some point in the future, or something like that. Maybe not <br /> <br />Minutes of October 10, 1995 Special CWCB Meeting <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.