My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00529
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00529
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:51:31 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:39:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
10/10/1995
Description
Special Meeting Minutes - October 10, 1995
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Harrison: <br /> <br />Lile: <br /> <br />Kuhn: <br /> <br />Gimble: <br /> <br />Kuhn: <br /> <br />Harrison: <br /> <br />Kuhn: <br /> <br />Wells: <br /> <br />Wright: <br /> <br />Wells: <br /> <br />Harrison: <br /> <br />or up to the amount that the state reaches full compact development under the 1922 <br />and 1948 compacts. I said that sort of clumsy, but the idea is up to 72 or full <br />compact development, whichever occurs first. <br /> <br />So 72 would be a cap on it, but modification might stop before that if we run out of <br />compact water. All right? Clarification of the motion? <br /> <br />You keep saying up to, but that's in addition to.. <br /> <br />That's right. In addition to the 52, we would modify for up to an additional 72, or up <br />to the point where Colorado reaches full compact development under the 1922 and <br />48 compacts. <br /> <br />Eric, I'm not sure in your motion there;s enough distinction, at least as I heard it, <br />between the first 52 and the second 72. They sounded the same to me, and I'm <br />assuming our actions are different in regard.... <br /> <br />I meant them that they would be different. I meant that they would.... <br /> <br />What I understood was that the first 52 is automatic, and the second 72 requires <br />modification proceeding. <br /> <br />The first 52 is automatic, OK? We would agree to terms and conditions to not <br />exercise the right at all, until at least 52,000 acre feet of additional development has <br />occurred on an average annual basis and distributed monthly, and that once that <br />52,000 acre feet of additional development or the monthly limits has occurs, we <br />would further agree to modify the right up to an additional 72,000 acre feet or up <br />until the point at which Colorado reaches full development under the 1922 and 48 <br />compacts, whichever occurs first. <br /> <br />Its the words, we will agree to terms and conditions not to exercise our rights...that <br />sounds the same to me in the second half as the first half. And I'm just trying to <br />think...and I realize that this is just semantics, but it seems to me that after that, after <br />the 52, and the monthly triggers, we will participate...we may exercise our right, we <br />may also agree not to exercise our right, but it's different than "we will agree to terms <br />and conditions not to exercise our rights." That sounds like the same thing. <br /> <br />How about "we will begin to exercise the right, however, an additional 72,000 acre <br />feet of depletions may occur subject to terms and conditions..." <br /> <br />Terms and conditions to be negotiated at the time, something like that. OK. Does <br />that make that more complicated? <br /> <br />So, let's get a motion out, and let's get a second. What I heard was, that we advise <br />staff... that we move to direct staff to move to final notification to appropriate a <br /> <br />Minutes of October 10, 1995 Special CWCB Meeting <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.