Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Agenda item 23i <br />January 26-27, 2000 Board Meeting <br />Page 5 of 13 <br /> <br />and 5) establishment of specific procedures by which implementation of flow <br />recommendations developed by the Program's Biology Committee would be <br />accomplished during the research period. The reasonable and prudent alternatives for the <br />Animas-La Plata Project continue to provide the reasonable and prudent altematives for <br />Endangered Species Act compliance purposes for the depletion impacts of all water <br />depletions in the San Juan River Basin existing as of October 25, 1991, the date of the <br />Animas-La Plata biological opinion. Non-depletion impacts of water development and <br />management activities existing as of October 25, 1991 that are subject to future ESA <br />compliance are addressed in these principles. <br /> <br />4.0 Environmental Baseline for the Navajo Indian Irrigation Project <br /> <br />The Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) submitted a biological assessment on completion of <br />the Navajo Indian Irrigation Project, Blocks 9, 10, and II on June II, 1999. BrA <br />estimates that irrigation of these blocks will increase annual depletions from the San Juan <br />River by about 120,580 AF/yr under equilibrium conditions, and, if all acreage is <br />irrigated, by about 137,580 AF/yr on average until return flows reach equilibrium. The <br />depletion will require an average annual diversion of about 337,500 AF/yr. <br /> <br />The biological assessment demonstrated that Navajo Dam could be re-operated to mimic <br />a natural hydrograph of the San Juan River and "to meet the flow'recommendations for <br />recovery of the endangered Colorado pikeminnow and razorback sucker." The biological <br />assessment also demonstrated that "the depletion of water from the San Juan River <br />necessary to support the proposed project would still allow flow recommendations <br />formulated for the recovery of the two endangered fish species to be met through the re- <br />operation of the dam." <br /> <br />The NIIP biological assessment environmental baseline included all existing depletions <br />as of June, 1999, and all depletions identified in Section 7 c9nsultations that were <br />conducted by the Service through that time, including the 57,100 AF/yr by the Animas- <br />La Plata Project and all projects in the environmental baseline fC'l' the Animas-La Plata <br />Project. The Service concurred with the biological assessment finding that the full <br />completion of the NIIP as described in the June II, 1999 biological assessment "may <br />effect, but is not likely to adversely effect the endangered southwest willow flycatcher, <br />Colorado pikeminnow or razorback sucker; nor is the project likely to result in adverse <br />modification or destruction of habitat designated in the San Juan basin for the Colorado <br />pikeminnow or razorback sucker." <br /> <br />BrA committed to remove impediments to fish passage at Navajo-owned diversion dams <br />(Hogback and Cudei), to construct and operate three ponds to rear razorback sucker for <br />stocking in the San Juan River, and to monitor selenium discharges in irrigation return <br />flows. BIA also committed to continuing funding of and participation in the San Juan <br />River Basin Recovery Implementation Program. <br /> <br />5.0 Long-Range Plan, <br />