Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Endangered and Threatened Species of/he Platte River <br /> <br />The committee concluded that current habitat conditions on the central Platte River <br />adversely affect the likelihood of survival of the interior least tern-in much the same fashion as <br />they affect the likelihood of survival of the piping plover-and that on the basis of available <br />information, current habitat conditions on the central Platte River adversely affect the likelihood <br />of recovery of the interior least tern. Reliable population estimates indicate that the total <br />(regional) population of interior least terns was at the recovery goal of7,000 in 1995, but some <br />breeding areas, including the central Platte River, were not at identified recovery levels. The <br />central Platte subpopulation of least terns declined from 1991 to 200 I. The number of tems <br />using the Platte River is about two-thirds of the number needed to reach the interior least tem <br />recovery goal for the Platte. The interior tem is nesting in substantial numbers on the adjacent <br />lower Platte River, but numbers continue to decline on the central Platte, reflecting declining <br />habitat conditions there. The decline in the tern population on the central Platte River has been <br />coincidental with the loss of numerous bare sandbars and beaches along the river. Control of <br />flows and diversion of water from the channel are the causes of these geomorphic changes. <br />Woodland vegetation, unsuitable as tern habitat, has colonized some parts of the central Platte <br />River, Altemative habitats such as abandoned sand mines or sandy shores of Lake McConaughy <br />are not suitable substitutes for Platte River habitat because they are susceptible to disturbance by <br />humans and natural predators. The shores of Lake McConaughy are available only at lower <br />stages of the reservoir, and they disappear at high stages. <br /> <br />6. Do current habitat conditions in the lower Platte (below the mouth 0/ the Elkhorn River) affect <br />the likelihood o/survival of the pallid sturgeon? Do they limit [adversely affect) its recovery? <br /> <br />Current habitat conditions on the lower Platte River (downstream of the mouth of the <br />Elkhorn River) do not adversely affect the likelihood of survival and recovery of the pallid <br />sturgeon because that reach ofthe river appears to retain several habitat characteristics <br />apparently preferred by the species: a braided channel of shifting sandbars and islands; a sandy <br />substrate; relatively warm, turbid waters; and a flow regime that is similar to conditions that were <br />found in the upper Missouri River and its tributaries before the installation of large dams on the <br />Missouri. Alterations of discharge patterns or channel features that modifY those characteristics <br />might irreparably alter this habitat for pallid sturgeon use. In addition, the lower Platte River is <br />connected with a long undammed reach of the Missouri River, which allows access of the pallid <br />sturgeon in the Platte River to other segments of the existing population. Channelization and <br />damming of the Missouri River have depleted pallid sturgeon habitats throughout its former <br />range, so the lower Platte may be even more important for its survival and recovery, The <br />population of pallid sturgeon is so low in numbers, and habitat such as the lower Platte River that <br />replicates the original undisturbed habitat of the species is so rare that the lower Platte River is <br />pivotal in the management and recovery ofthe species. <br /> <br />7. Were the processes and methodologies used by the USFWS in developing its central Platte <br />River lnstream Flow Recommendations (i.e. species, annual pulse flows, and peak flows) <br />scientifically valid? . . <br /> <br />USFWS used methods described in an extensive body of scientific and engineering <br />literature. Reports of interagency working groups that addressed instream flow recommendations <br />cite more than 80 references that were in wide use and generally accepted in the river science <br /> <br />8 <br />