BOARD00489 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I .. . . e . This section prohibits the use of "public moneys from any source," not the use of "public funds". The general assembly thus selected a phrase not previously construed in seeking to limit the expenditure of funds by various governmental entities for certain purposes. Denver Area Labor Fed'n v. Buckley, 924 P.2d 524 (Colo. 1996). This section tends to promote public confidence in govemment by prohibiting the use of moneys authorized for expenditure by political subdivisions for specified public purposes to advance the personal viewpoint of one group over another. A political subdivision's use of moneys that were authorized for expenditure for the benefit of an insured to oppose the passage of an amendment proposed by an insured is the type of conduct the general assembly intended to prohibit by the enactment of this section. Denver Area Labor Fed'n v. Buckley, 924 P.2d 524 (Colo. 1996). What is of "official concern" to school district board of education is to be determined by reference to the official powers and duties delegated by the general assembly in the school laws. Mountain States Legal Foundation v. Denver School Dis!. No. 1,459 F. Supp. 357 (D. Colo. 1978). A matter of official concern is one which at the very least involves questions which come before the officials for an official decision. Campbell v. Joint Dis!. 28-J, 704 F.2d 501 (lOth Cir. 1983). Proposed constitutional amendment not of official concern. A proposed amendment to the state constitution on a general election ballot is not a matter of official concern. Campbell v. Joint Dis!. 28-J, 704 F.2d 501 (lOth Cir. 1983). Not determined solely by board. The characterization of a campaign issue as being of "official concern" is not a judgment which can be made solely by the board of education; such an interpretation of this section would give unlimited discretion to the school board to use school funds and school facilities whenever it suited the personal preference of the majority of the members. Mountain States Legal Foundation v. Denver School Dis!. No. 1,459 F. Supp. 357 (D. Colo. 1978). This section allows an employee with policy-making responsibility to expend public funds up to the $50 limit in expressing an opinion about a pending ballot issue. Regents of the University of Colorado v. Meyer, 899 P.2d 316 (Colo. App. 1995). Public school payroll deduction system for teachers' union dues, a portion of which was given by the union to a political action committee, did not constitute a "contribution in kind" because it did not support a specific "issue" or "candidate" that the political action committee supported or opposed during the time that the district made the payroll deductions. Mountain States v. Secretary of State, 946 P.2d 586 (Colo. App. 1997) (decided under law in effect prior to 1997 amendment)..