My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00489
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00489
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:51:01 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:39:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/24/2000
Description
Impacts of Initiative 205 on Water Districts
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />'e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Question 9. How does the Amendment affect the State income tax? <br /> <br />The Amendment may reduce each income tax bill in three ways. First, the <br />Amendment requires a basic income tax cut each year. Second, the Food Tax Cut discussed in <br />Question 8 could result in an income tax cut. Finally, the income tax is subject to a cut related to <br />the amount of estate taxes collected by the State in each year. The estate tax cut would probably be <br />calculated much like the Food Tax Cut. The State will determine its total annual estate tax revenue <br />and divide that revenue by the total number of income tax returns. If that amount equals or exceeds <br />$25 in 2002 (assumed by the Title Board to be the first year of the income tax cut), then the income <br />tax is cut by another $25. <br /> <br />In the fust year of the income tax cut, a single person could receive an income tax <br />cut ofas much $75 due to application of the Amendment. The Amendment specifically requires <br />that joint income tax returns be treated as two tax bills. The maximum potential income tax cut on <br />ajoint return, therefore, is $150 in the first year. (Note that this rule only applies to the income tax <br />and not to other joint tax returns.) In addition, note that this tax cut is just that - a reduction in <br />income taxes owed. It is not a tax credit, which even persons who owe no income tax can claim. <br /> <br />OSPB estimates the total income tax revenue loss for the thirty month period ending <br />June 30, 2003 to be approximately $627.6 million (including all three potential income tax cuts). <br /> <br />As with the other tax cuts, certain issues remain to be resolved. One such issue is the <br />"base" years to be used. For example, should the State use 2001 estate taxes and sales taxes to <br />calculate the income tax cut in 2002? Or is it required to use 2002 estimated figures? If the <br />estimated figures result in a tax cut which is smaller or larger than the required tax cut, what <br />procedures are to be followed? <br /> <br />Question 10. What is the affect of the Amendment on the specific ownership tax? <br /> <br />The specific ownership tax is imposed annually on each vehicle registered in <br />Colorado. The tax is imposed at differing rates depending upon the age of the vehicle and declines <br />each year as the vehicle depreciates. The specific ownership tax is collected by the State <br />Department of Revenue and distributed to each county in proportion to the amount of miles of State <br />highways in each county. At the county level, it is then distributed to each local government which <br />levies a property tax in proportion to the total amount of property taxes levied. DOLA estimates that <br />the total revenue lost to local governments in 2001 as a result of this tax cut will be $58.2 million. <br /> <br />It should be noted that smaller taxing entities may be disproportionately impacted <br />by the specific ownership tax cut. Smaller taxing entities are likely to have a larger percentage of <br />their tax revenue cut as a result of the basic property tax cut revenue. Because distribution of <br />specific ownership tax revenue could be based on reduced total tax collections, those smaller entities <br />also may receive a proportionately smaller share of specific ownership tax revenue. <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.