My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00489
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00489
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:51:01 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:39:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/24/2000
Description
Impacts of Initiative 205 on Water Districts
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />'e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />district which would have received $21.50 in revenue from a parcel of property in the flIst year <br />would receive no revenue from that property if the Amendment passes. <br /> <br />For a school district which has an override levy in addition to its general fund levy, <br />it is unclear whether the required tax cut will be applied 10 the override levy, the general fund levy <br />or on a pro rata basis. The General Assembly may ultimately legislate this. <br /> <br />Some analysts have speculated that the tax cut could apply to each individual tax <br />levied by a single taxing entity. For example, counties typically levy a tax for the general fund, the <br />road and bridge fund, social services expenditures and debt service. In some counties, these are <br />shown as separate line items on a tax bill; in others the levies are combined to show as a single tax <br />on the tax bill. However, the more reasonable argument is that each taxing entity will suffer only <br />one reduction per year rather than multiple reductions for each line item. <br /> <br />The Title Board estimated that the minimum amount oflost property tax revenue will <br />be approximately $114.4 million for tax bills due in 2002 (which it assumes to be the first property <br />tax collection year to which the Amendment will apply). <br /> <br />Additional Reductions to ProoerlY Tax Revenue. In addition, local government <br />property tax revenue may be further reduced due to mandated tax cuts on the collection of sales <br />taxes on food and drink (except for alcohol and tobacco). This tax cut is discussed in further detail <br />in Question 8. <br /> <br />Question 7. How does the Amendment impact the sales tax? <br /> <br />Sales taxes imposed by the State and by local governments are impacted in two ways. <br />First, any sales tax which is levied on consumers for various utility services such as gas, electricity, <br />telephone, and cable television will be reduced in 2001. Utilities typically bill their customers <br />monthly; the monthly charge includes the sales taxes imposed by governments. While the issue is <br />not settled, it is possible that the Amendment will require the tax cut to be applied to each monthly <br />bill. (The Amendment states that "a $25 tax cut...shalllower each tax in each tax bill... "). Because <br />such taxes rarely total $25 per month, for most consumers this interpretation would effectively <br />eliminate these taxes. <br /> <br />The State believes that the fiscal impact of this sales tax cut will be significant but <br />is unable to quantify the amount; however, the State Department of Local Affairs ("DOLA") <br />estimates that local governments would lose approximately $39.1 million in revenue in 2001. <br /> <br />Second, the Amendment will cut the sales and use taxes imposed on the sale of <br />vehicles. DOLA estimates that local government revenue lost as a result of this cut in 2001 will be <br />$38.9 million and the State Office of Planning and Budget estimates a State loss of$35 million from <br />January I through June 30, 2003 (two and one-half fiscal years). Losses in this category will <br />increase each year; for example, ifa vehicle is purchased in a2003, the Amendment's tax cut is $75. <br />on that vehicle. <br /> <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.