My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00469
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00469
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:50:52 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:39:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/12/1976
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes, Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />MR. MAYNES: And perhaps get into a conflict with the City of Durango <br />with regard to abandonment. <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: That's a possibility, yes. <br /> <br />Are there any further questions from members of the Board? <br /> <br />MR. BURR: I wasn't here last meeting, but I understand the commissioners <br />from Jackson County and also the Jackson County Water Conservancy Board <br />made objections to these in Jackson County, which is six lakes on here. <br />And they're back on here now, and I wondered if they have withheld their <br />objections on these lakes being put back on there. All of the commis- <br />sioners together with the Conservancy District didn't care to vote for <br />them, and of course it didn't include me because I wan I there. But it <br />will mean that I will object to these six lakes at this time. <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: My recollection of the meeting was that whatever lakes <br />they objected to we approved at that time and these must be additional <br />lakes. <br /> <br />MR. BURR: Are these different ones? <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: Yes. <br /> <br />MR. BURR: Over and above their objections? <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: Yes. <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: I got a nice note <br />me for the opportunity to appear, <br />the issue. <br /> <br />from one of the commissioners thanking <br />and stating that they knew:they lost <br /> <br />MR. FETCHER: I would like to know <br />Fred or someone else with the City <br />I have only underlined three here. <br /> <br />exactly what lakes are involved from <br />of Durango. They have mentioned four. <br />What are the four lakes, Fred? <br /> <br />MR. KROEGER: There is the Upper Florida Reservoir; Lily Lake, Castilleja, <br />which is listed here, and one other. <br /> <br />MR. FETCHER: I mean those that are on our list. <br /> <br />MR. KROEGER: Castilleja<is the only one of the city ones that I rec- <br />ognize in that group. <br /> <br />MR. FETCHER: But you mentioned Big and Little Emerald. <br /> <br />MR. KROEGER: I think eighty-five acre-feet of capacity in Big Emerald <br />is overstated by three times also. <br /> <br />MR. FETCHER: "But it isn't involved with the City of Durango? <br /> <br />MR. KROEGER: No, it is not. But I recognize these things as being <br />grossly overstated on some that I was strongly concerned about. My con- <br />cern is that if the Division of Wildlife is doing that kind of sloppy <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />-l8- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.