My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00453
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00453
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:50:18 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:38:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
2/26/1975
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes, Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />Reservoir or by furnishing water down to this point, to the road up at <br />this point. If a minimum stream flow requirement requires that the <br />water go down to Greeley No.2, the river will dry up at that point, <br />rather than at this point or this point. But the point is that when <br />you go down here there is still going to be a dry stream and the result <br />is that these reservoirs are absolutely useless because there is none <br />of them that can be used by the ditches to whom they belong. They can <br />only be used by exchange. <br /> <br />Another example and a very important one which has a tremendous effect <br />on the regimen of the river, that makes reservoirs useful, concerns the <br />use of the Poudre Valley Canal. The Poudre Valley Canal can divert <br />above the mouth of the canyon not under its own priority which isn't <br />worth a hoot, but because we have reservoirs down here which can supply <br />the Greeley No. 2 Canal. This is the decreed water diversion for the <br />Greeley No. 2 which is very good. If it gets water from the Larimer <br />and Weld system, then Larimer and Weld can divert at this point. Or <br />perhaps Larimer and Weld want to use other of its reservoirs which <br />cannot fill except through the Poudre Valley Canal and by supplying <br />Greeley No. 2 it can divert way up to the head of the canyon and fill <br />these reservoirs which would otherwise never be filled. <br /> <br />Now, as I say, these are illustrative of the problem only. They are <br />not meant to be the only examples because each one of these reservoirs <br />and each one of these ditches from time to time can use some exchange. <br />The pO,int is however, that if these exchanges are in any way interferred <br />with we will lose the ability to use substantial amounts of water. <br /> <br />It might be suggested by some that we have the right as we do to go <br />into court and get these exchanges confirmed by the court and thus <br />perhaps beat the state of Colorado and Game and Fish Department in our <br />priorities because our exchanges go back some time. And this is probably <br />true and I think I can assure you that if the State Game and Fish goes <br />in for its minimum stream flow, it will be a race to the court house <br />door with our exchanges. But even that won't help because what we <br />will do is we will stifle y.t:;ur imagination. The exchanges we use today <br />are more sophisticated than the exchanges we used ten years ago. We <br />have extremely imaginative division engineers and water commissioners. <br />They are continually finding new and better ways to encourage the <br />maximum utilization of the waters of the Poudre Basin. Apparently, <br />there are things that are going to happen that we could not now very <br />easily get a decree for because they have not yet happened. The ditches <br />that you will see on your map that go through Fort Collins are being <br />overdrawn by Fort Collins. The same has to be true with the city of <br />Greeley. <br /> <br />The city of Fort Collins, for instance, is trying to enlarge Joe wright <br />reservoir which it now owns from its present 800 acre-feet to 8,000 <br />acre-feet and perhaps can store these wateIS here by exchange. But if <br />the State Game and Fish has a 1975 priority and we don't get this done <br />for ten years, then we can't do it because we would interfere from the <br />Rustic down with the minimum stream flow which would be a regrettable <br />thing. <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />-16- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.