Laserfiche WebLink
<br />11" <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br /> <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br /> <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 721 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3441 <br />FAX: (303) 866-4474 <br />www.cwcb.state.co.us <br /> <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />Bill Owens <br />Governor <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board Members <br /> <br />Randy Seaholm, Chief, Water Supply Protection ~ <br />May 13, 2003 <br /> <br />Greg E. Walcher <br />Executive Director <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />Rod Kuharich <br />CWCB Director <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />Dan McAuliffe <br />Deputy Director <br /> <br />SUBJECT: Agenda Item 25, May 19-20, 2003 Board Meeting- <br />Colorado River Issues - California Quantification Settlement Agreement (QSA) <br /> <br />Introduction: <br /> <br />As lower basin water uses have approached 75 million acre feet (MAF), it has become necessary for <br />California to reduce its use of Colorado River water from 5.2 MAF to the 4-4 MAP allowed by the <br />Compact In order to accomplish this, California needed to quantifY its water users rights to <br />Colorado River water and to address the transfer of some agricultural water to municipal uses, The <br />Quantification Settlement Agreement (QSA) was one of several agreements required to accomplish <br />the task, Interim Surplus Guidelines and Inadvertent Overrun and Payback Criteria were also <br />developed and put in place to help provide a "soft landing." The Interim Surplus Guidelines <br />required that the QSA be fully executed by December 31,2002 or California and other Lower Basin <br />States would not receive any of the surplus water supplies made available pursuant to the Interim <br />Surplus Guidelines, Although California failed to reach agreement on the QSA by the December 31, <br />2002 deadline, they continued to work towards a QSA agreement On March 12, 2003 the State, <br />Imperial Irrigation District (lID), Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD), Metropolitan Water <br />District of Southern California (MWD) and San Diego County Water Authority (SDCW A) reached <br />tentative agreement on a revised QSA pending approvals by the agency Boards. Approval was <br />conditioned on reinstatement of the Interim Surplus Guidelines (ISG), resolution of inadvertent <br />overrun payback issues, settlement of the lID v. U.S. litigation, passage of implementing legislation <br />by the California legislature, and Department of Interior acceptance of certain agreements. The <br />substance of the QSA and certain agreements was presented to Interior and the other Colorado River <br />Basin States on March 13, 2003, <br /> <br />March 12, 2003 California OSA Summarv: <br /> <br />The attached summary was developed from the overhead handouts provided on March 13,2003. <br /> <br />General Overview <br /> <br />L 51 legal agreements have been fully fleshed out between California Department of Water <br /> <br />Resources, lID, CVWD, SDCW A and MWD. <br /> <br />Flood Protection. Water Supply Planning and Finance. Stream and Lake Protection <br />Water Supply Protection. Conservation and Drought Planning <br />