My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00444
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00444
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:50:09 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:38:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/11/1961
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />MR, MC CANDLESS: <br /> <br />MR, STAPLETON: <br /> <br />GOVERNOR JOHNSON: <br /> <br />reach a level that cannot be obtained unless <br />the river flow changes back to the historic <br />flow which existed prior to the time these <br />original studies were made. And based upon <br />that impossible goal they assess us for the <br />deficiencies, which couldn't be made in the <br />first instance even without Glen Canyon on the <br />river. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />We object to that. If, on the other hand, <br />these contracts are now renegotiated as they <br />specifically provide, back to the time they <br />were written and you now reassess the firm power <br />in the light of what they know they can gener- <br />ate, so that the firm power instead of being up <br />here at 4,000,000,000 KW would be down here at <br />3,000,000,000 ro1 plus. Instead of ~eleasing to <br />meet this peak (the four billion) you would <br />only have to release to meet this peak (the <br />three billion plus) which correspondingly de- <br />creases the demand upon Glen Canyon, and we can <br />get it filled. Therefore we say the criteria <br />is impossible for us to live with because of <br />that circumstance. <br /> <br />So in the first instance they have to make <br />it a realistic deficiency, and secondly, if we <br />are going to pay any deficiency, it must be <br />returned to us. That's our position. We hope <br />to continue negotiations so that this thing can <br />be mutually worked out. We ~ conclude this <br />matter. The wolf is almost here. <br /> <br />That's all I have, Mr. Chairman." <br /> <br />"What about the next Board meeting?" <br /> <br />I <br />"Governor Johnson, as a member of the Upper <br />Colorado River Commission, do you have any com- <br />ments you would like to make?" <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />"No. I'm in complete accord wi th .the views <br />and statements that have been made by Larry <br />Sparks, It is my opinion, and also my hope, <br />that our neighboring states in the Upper Colo- <br />rado River Basin will concur with us in this <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.