Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />"Can you take us through this item, Mr. <br />Sparks?" <br /> <br />"The Board is acquainted with the problem <br />in connection with the Savery-Pot Hook. That <br />project repo~t has been completed and everything <br />necessary to get the project underway has been <br />completed, and is now awaiting action by the <br />United States Congress. The report, however, <br />points out that the State of Wyoming will not <br />have sufficient power revenues accruing to it, <br />to allow construction to get underway before <br />1970, The State of Colorado, on the other hand, <br />has ample funds to repay its part of the project <br />cost - 68% being allocated to the State of <br />Colorado. <br /> <br />As the Bqard will recall, Mr, Gildersleeve, <br />our Deputy Director, made an analysis of future <br />power revenues that would accrue to Colorado <br />under the Storage Project Act through about the <br />year 2030. By means of that schedule we deter- <br />mined that we could loan Wyoming power revenues <br />which would not interfere with any conceivable <br />construction schedule which we could enter into <br />under the participating part of the Storage <br />Project Act. The only thing we are not able to <br />determine definitely,or haven't been up to this <br />date, is how much money Wyoming will require, <br />The project report shows an amount slightly in <br />excess of $4,000,000. We have been trying to <br />arrive at a more definite figure in view of the <br />fact that some of the Wyoming projects do not <br />now appear to be feasible, or one of them, and <br />some change in the Seedskadee Project has taken <br />place. This morning I received a letter from <br />Mr. Clinton, Director of Region 4, to the effect <br />that in his opinion, Wyoming would need as an <br />upper limit the sum of $500,000. I viewed this <br />letter with a tremendous relief because we have <br />been thinking in terms of $4,000,000 to <br />$5,000,000; and that those revenues could be <br />repaid to the State of Colorado by the year <br />2030, if anybody is going to be around that <br />long, This is almost nothing to us. <br />