My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00443
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00443
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:50:06 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:38:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/23/2001
Description
ISF Section - New Recommendations in Division 4: Garfield, Gunnison, Hinsdale, Mesa, Montrose and San Miguel Counties
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />BALCO~ &: GREEN, P.C. <br />ATTOR~l."S ^~'l' l..AW <br /> <br /> <br />Dan Merriman and Mark Uppendahl <br />Telluride and MVMD ConcemsforISF Priorities <br /> <br />June 7, 2001 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />concentrations, possibly associated with the ldarado Mine, are high enough to impede <br />growth and reproduction of aquatic life. . <br /> <br />The biological assessment indicates that mitigating the problems listed above is rnore <br />important for improving fishery habitat in the San Miguel than increasing instream flows. <br />Mitigation of these problems should occur before consideration of any additional instream <br />appropriations. <br /> <br />C. There is Insufficient Water in the San Mi~uel for Adpitional AppropriatioI'l.s <br /> <br />In addition, and most importantly, review of available flow data indicates that water <br />for additional instream flow appropriations is not physically available in the San Miguel. <br />Wright Water Engineers conducted a hydrologic study on the San Miguel to investigate the <br />injury to Telluride and MVMD water rights posed by an additional 9.0 c.f.s. instream flow. <br />The study relied on data obtained from the Mahoney Street Gage, which is used to <br />administer our clients' rights in relation to the existing 6.5 d.s. minimum flow. <br /> <br />The study results demonstrate that, during an average year, flows in the San Miguel <br />at Mahoney Street are lower than 15.5 d.s. more than twenty-six (26) percent of the time <br />in August, fifty-seven (57) percent ofthe time in September, and seventy-seven (77) percent <br />of the time in October. Under dry-year conditions (the driest 20% of all years), flows are <br />lower than 15.5 d.s. more than fifty-seven (57) percent oithe time in August, seventy-seven <br />(77) percent of the time in September, and all (100 percent) of the time in October.l <br /> <br />Furthermore, the flow statistics relied upon by Wright Water Engineers include the <br />unquanfified Blue Lake discharges discussed above. Because these Blue Lake discharges <br />include transbasin waters, there is no guarantee that the recorded flow levels at the <br />Mahoney Street Gage will persist in the future. Wright Water Engineers' study may, <br />therefore, present an optimistic view of future conditions. <br /> <br />Based on the reasons detailed above. the current conditions in the San lVIiguel clearly <br />do not support additional instream appropriations by the CWCB. Any appropriations will <br />result in almost certain injury to other owners of San lVIiguel rights, and will most likely fail <br />to provide the benefits sought by the CWCB. <br /> <br />Shortage conditions will also occur during June and July in both average and dry years. <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.