My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00425
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00425
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:49:57 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:37:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/26/2006
Description
WSP Section - RICD Rules Recommendations
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />iii. The proximity of the RICD to suitable upstream points of diversion or storage . <br />which may be utilized by lhose who would place the water to consumptive <br />beneficial use; <br />iv. The existence of suitable downstream points of diversion or storage for <br />consumptive beneficial uses before the water leaves the state; <br />v. Exchange opportunities within the state that may be adversely impacted by the <br />existence of the RICD; <br />VI. Whether the basin is over-appropriated; <br />Vll. The effect on other decreed, existing undecreed, or reasonably foreseeable uses of <br />the amount of water claimed; <br />viii. Whether a RICD shields waters from a consumptive use that would otherwise be <br />available under a particular compact; <br />tX. Whether beneficial consumptive water use opportunities upstream from the <br />claimed RICD would further develop Colorado's compact entitlements and would <br />be impaired by applicant's sought for stream flow amounts; and, <br />x. What provisions in the application are proposed for reducing or canceling the <br />RICD? <br /> <br />b. Whether the exercise of the RICD would cause material injury to existing ISF water <br />rights. The board, in making this finding, may consider, but is not limited to, the <br />following: <br />I. The nature and extent of the ISF in the proposed reach or any affected <br />downstream reach; <br />11. The timing and duration of the RICD as such may relate to the specific natural <br />environment for which the ISF was decreed; <br />ltl. Whether the RICD, or administration of the RICD, would negatively impact the <br />natural environment for which the ISF was decreed; and, <br />IV. Whether during the construction of the RICD structures, the construction may <br />cause material injury to the ISF or the natural environment for which the ISF was <br />decreed. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />c. Whether the adjudication and administration of the RlCD, in the amounts claimed, would <br />promote-maximum utilization of the waters of the State. The board, in making this <br />finding, may consider, but is not limited to, the following: <br />i. Whether there are any probable future upstream junior appropriations for direct <br />diversion or storage; <br />11. Whether there are any probable future changes, transfers, or exchanges of water <br />rights from points of diversion downstream of the reach affected by the RICD to <br />points upstream of or in the reach affected by the RICD; <br />111. Whether existing federal policies, regulations and laws affect or will be affected <br />by the RICD; <br />IV. Whether a reasonable and efficient means is to be utilized to use, divert, capture <br />and control the water for a RICD so as to minimize its call upon the river and <br />avoid waste; <br />v. Whether a reasonable demand exists for the recreational activity in question as <br />determined by levels of current use and/or estimates of future use; <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.