My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00398
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00398
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:49:49 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:37:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/24/2006
Description
WSP Section - GOCO Great Outdoors Colorado RICD Policy
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.ocky Mountain News: Local <br /> <br />, <br />Page I of <br />, <br /> <br />Rocky Mountain News <br /> <br />To print this page, select File then Print from your browser <br />URL: http:j jwww.rockymountainnews.com/drmnjlocal/article/O ,1299, DRM N_15_ 4331300,00, htmJ <br />White-water park rules drafted <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />GOCO to clarify policies on grants for construction <br /> <br />By ]erd Smith, Rocky Mountain News <br />December 21, 2005 <br /> <br />Great Outdoors Colorado is drafting new rules for white-water parks, saying it wants to clarify its own policies on how grants to buiid the parks an <br />awarded. <br /> <br />White-water advocates worry that the proposed rules may serve to restrict construction of the parks, which are wildly popular with kayakers and <br />the cities that host them. <br /> <br />At the same time, the Colorado Water Conservation Board - charged with regulating the streams in which the parks operate - has asked GOCO t <br />tread lightly in the highly charged water arena, saying that cities that win GOCO grants to build the parks too often use the extra money to battle <br />the water board in court over the contentious waler issues associated with the kayak courses. <br /> <br />Great Outdoors Colorado, created by voters in 1 992, awards millions of dollars in lottery proceeds each year to help protect open space and <br />enhance recreation across the state. <br /> <br />One of the key issues in the debate over the water parks is whether the cities that are building them are claiming too much water for their course, <br />and, in the process, making it harder for other cities or farmers who use water from the same stream to manage their own supplies. <br /> <br />Communities that have won GOCO grants for their parks say it is critical that the agency continue funding park construction. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Since 2000, 15 communities have applied for grants to build white-water parks. GOCO has awarded grants to five of those, including Pueblo, <br />Lyons and Palisade. <br /> <br />Puebio is also one of the cities battling the water conservation board over water rights for its course. <br /> <br />Tom Fiorczak, Pueblo's assislant city attorney, said he's worried that GOCO's new rules may serve 10 restrict new course development and that <br />the water conservation board is trying to push GOCO into a more restrictive stance toward the water parks. <br /> <br />''The Colorado Water Conservation Board wants to use its position under state law to restrict further development of these parks," Florczak said. <br />"But it would be wrong of GOCO to cave in to this kind of thing." <br /> <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board's Ted Kowalski denies that charge, but he said there is concern about how GOCO interacts with cities on <br />recreational water issues. <br /> <br />it's clear GOCO has the authority to fund the park's construction, Kowalski said. "But there is still a policy question thaI needs to be answered," h <br />said. "If by funding a GOCO project, that frees up money for cities to be used in litigation with the state over water rights, is that a proper use of <br />GOCO funds?" <br /> <br />John Swartout, GOCO's executive director, said his agency is aware of the water board's concerns and in fact invited the board's staff to <br />comment on the proposed ruies. <br /> <br />"We're an independent, quasi-state agency," Swartout said. "Not only is it important that GOCO stay independent, we don't want to get in the <br />middle of the fight between the state and these cities. It's just not our fight. We've funded these parks in the past and we will continue to fund <br />them in the future." <br /> <br />GOCO's local government committee will discuss the proposed rules at a meeting at 10 a.m., Feb. 16 at its offices in Denver, at 1600 BroadW. <br />suite 1650. The GOCO board is expected to examine the proposal at its meeting in March. <br /> <br />Copyright 2005, Rocky Mountain News. All Rights Reserved. <br /> <br />:tp://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/cda/articleyrint/O. 1983,DRMN _15_4331300_ ARTICLE- DET... 12/22/200 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.