My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00390
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00390
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:49:47 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:37:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
8/6/1953
Description
Minutes and Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />218 <br /> <br />MR. CRAWFORD: <br /> <br />3efore discussing this I think it should be <br />said that each of tpese contracts carries a <br />clause to the effect that upon request of the <br />contractor, the Water Board has the power to <br />extend the time,. just as we did a few minutes <br />ago with the Bureau of Business Research <br />contract. Mr. Meaker was in the office the <br />other d~. I explained that to him and he <br />seemed to feel quite relieved. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. BAILEY: <br /> <br />Any suggestions with reference to this letter. <br /> <br />MR. ROBERTS: <br /> <br />Mr. Hill or Mr. Jewett have not requested <br />additional time or complained tDat they find <br />the data available to them insufficient. So <br />far as they have gone there is nothing to <br />indicate that anything more than the one <br />extension we have granted would make this <br />report anything other than a report we can <br />rely upon. <br /> <br />MR. MOSES: <br /> <br />We should advise Mr. Meaker that the Board <br />is as anxious as he is to have a good job <br />done. There is no desire on our part to have <br />a job done which is not thorough. <br /> <br />MR. BAILEY: <br /> <br />I think probably Mr. Hi ter knows as much about <br />it as anybody. Would you bring us up to date? <br /> <br />MR. RITER: <br /> <br />I can't speak for what the Hill firm is doing. <br />The Engineering Research Committee has concerned <br />itself primarily with an analysis of what our <br />present cor,rnitted uses are and have turned over <br />to the Hill people all reports the Bureau has <br />prepared in the past, and we know definitely <br />that the Bureau's land classification had not <br />been extended in the Vnllte, Yampa and San Juan <br />);0 the extent that it was in the main Colorado. <br />The Conference Committee is ma~_ng arrangements <br />to supplement missing data in the White, Yampa <br />and San Juan Basins. I think t he Dean can explain <br />that. That is one thing the Bureau hadn 1 t got <br />yet. Back in the middle 30 I s under the direction <br />of Mr. Preston we made land classification surveys <br />for the entire Colorado Hi ver Basin and experience <br />has shown that some of the land we rejected has <br />subsequentlY been irrigated. We had to be <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.