Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Artificial Recharge of Ground Water in Colorado <br />A Statewide Assessment <br /> <br />The northern end of the valley, where there is no external drainage of surface water, is referred to <br />as the "Closed Basin." A ground-water divide separates the Closed Basin from the alluvial <br />aquifer underlying the Rio Grande and, for water management purposes, ground water in the <br />Closed Basin is not considered to be in hydraulic connection to the surface flow ofthe Rio <br />Grande. This separation has affected how irrigators in the Closed Basin use their water. In this <br />area, surface water is imported from the Rio Grande for irrigation and recharged via five <br />principle ditches shown in Figure VI-3. <br /> <br />Water is recharged at many individual sites throughout the irrigation season, with cumulative <br />rates averaging over 120,000 ac-ft per year when water is available from the canals. The farmers <br />then pump from wells as needed while the individual ditch companies maintain an account of <br />recharge and pumping totals (Steve Vandiver, oral commun., 2003). The accounting system in <br />the San Luis Valley is much simpler than that in the South Platte River Basin since it is held that <br />pumping ground water from within the Closed Basin does not cause depletions to the Rio Grande <br />and the ground-water usage is not administered with augmentation plans. <br /> <br />In addition to the conjunctive use within the Closed Basin, water is also recharged during the <br />winter by the Rio Grande Water Users Association (RGWUA) using six principal ditches over a <br />larger area covering the west central portion ofthe valley that includes the Closed Basin (Figure <br />VI-3). Reported annual recharge totals have been as high as 20,000 ac-ft. Recharge by the <br />RGWUA offsets depletions to the Rio Grande caused by pumping outside of the Closed Basin <br />and thus allows pumping to continue when surface flow is low. <br /> <br />Denver Basin Aquifer Storage and Recovery <br />The Denver Basin is a structural basin that encompasses much of the Denver and northern <br />Colorado Springs metropolitan areas (Figure VI-I), home to almost 60 percent of Colorado's <br />population. The administrative ground-water portion ofthe basin underlies a 6,700 square mile <br />area and is subdivided into the Dawson, Denver, Arapahoe, and Laramie-Fox Hills aquifers. <br />These aquifers consist of interbedded sandstone, conglomerate, shale, and claystone of Tertiary <br />to Upper Cretaceous age. The basin is asymmetrical with the center just west of the town of <br />Parker where the base of the Laramie-Fox Hills is approximately 3,000 feet deep. Water levels <br />are quite variable depending on geographic location as well as well depth. However, much of <br />the ground water in the basin is under confined conditions and is considered non-tributary. The <br />most prolific aquifer is the Arapahoe, which has a stratigraphic thickness ranging between 400 <br />and 700 feet and contains up to 400 feet of saturated sand and conglomerate. Transmissivities in <br />the Arapahoe aquifer range between 500 and 5,000 gpd/ft with pumping rates in excess of 1,000 <br />gpm common in the deepest part of the basin where there is sufficient available head above the <br />top of the aquifer. <br /> <br />In 1987, Robson estimated that the Denver Basin aquifer system has a storage capacity of <br />approximately 470 million ac-ft of water, however the actual amount ofrecoverable water may <br />be closer to 200 million ac-ft due to physical and practical limitations (Topper and others, 2003). <br />Still, this volume is a tremendous resource with over 1,000 times the volume of storage in Dillon <br />Reservoir, Denver Water's largest surface reservoir. The DWR estimated that nearly 445,000 <br />ac-ft of water were withdrawn from the Denver Basin aquifer system in the Denver metropolitan <br />region in 1995, and the annual withdrawal has certainly increased since then. <br /> <br />46 <br />