Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />Artificial Recharge of Ground Water in Colorado <br />A Statewide Assessment <br /> <br />use of an injection well completed in the Dakota sandstone at Lincoln for storage using water <br />pumped from the alluvial aquifer. It is not clear from the literature whether there are any <br />ongoing AR applications at this time in Nebraska. <br /> <br />New Jersey <br />The state of New Jersey has nine relatively new ASR projects (ASR Forum, 2004). The nation's <br />first ASR well, operating since the late 1960s, is located at the Wildwood site and is now part of <br />a system of four wells. New Jersey utilizes ASR to augment municipal water supplies during <br />periods of high demand. <br /> <br />New York <br />AR has been practiced on Long Island since the 1930s. To help replenish the aquifer, as well as <br />reduce urban flooding and control saltwater intrusion, more than 3,000 recharge basins dispose <br />of storm runoff at an average rate of about ISO million gallons per day. Initially, many of these <br />basins were abandoned gravel pits, but since 1936 urban planners require developers to construct <br />recharge basins with new developments. Practically all basins are unlined excavations in the <br />upper glacial deposits and have areas from less than 0.1 to more than 30 acres (Alley and others, <br />1999). <br /> <br />Nevada <br />The Southern Nevada Water Authority has been using ASR to augment water supply since 1988, <br />and is currently cycling 60,000 to 72,000 ac-ft per year. The program was also designed to <br />partially abate a severe ground subsidence problem that has existed in the Las Vegas Valley <br />because of excessive ground-water withdrawal over the past several decades. <br /> <br /> <br />Texas <br />Projects in Texas primarily conduct AR into unconsolidated to semi-consolidated basin-fill <br />aquifers. Municipalities appear to be the primary operators of recharge projects with the primary <br />objectives being disposal of treated wastewater and storage of excess seasonal surface-water <br />resources. Injection is the dominant recharge method being used and volumes range from 33 to <br />12,000 ac-ft per year. Several small ASR projects are scattered around Texas, including El Paso, <br />KerrviIle, and San Antonio. <br /> <br />INTERNATIONAL PROJECTS <br />The use of AR internationally is concentrated within developed countries in Europe, the Middle <br />East, and in the South Pacific. A representation of the international recharge projects reviewed <br />for this study is presented in figure V-2. A brief discussion of some of the more significant <br />international projects follows. <br /> <br />Australia <br />The literature documents several small ASR projects scattered around Australia. At the Andrews <br />Farm project, passively treated storm water is injected into a brackish aquifer to improve water <br />quality for irrigation (UNEP, 2004). At the Burdekin River Delta project, about 50 gallons per <br />minute (gpm) of water is pumped from Burdekin River to a distribution network of natural and <br />artificial channels for surface infiltration. The system is the primary water source for the highest <br />yielding sugarcane farm in Australia. In the town of Clayton, one ASR well injects storm water <br /> <br />33 <br />