My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00343
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00343
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:49:10 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:36:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
10/27/1959
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.1.000, <br /> <br />the overwhelming bulk of the power that <br />is needed. Their argument is that Arizona <br />has heavy power demands during the summer <br />for air-conditioning and irrigation pump- <br />ing; Utah has heavy demands for the winter <br />period. Therefore Arizona can furnish peak I <br />power to Utah in the winter and Utah can <br />furnish peak power to Arizona in the sum- <br />mer. In that manner the capital investment <br />of both companies is materially reduced. <br /> <br />In addition to that, the private com- <br />panies say that the Arizona Public Service <br />Company will construct shortly, and have in <br />operation by 1962, a major thermal plant in <br />the Four Corners country, and that from this <br />thermal plant they will construct three 345 <br />KV lines into Phoenix, Arizona. You have to <br />bear in mind that the heavy power user in <br />these five states is the State of Arizona. <br /> <br />"The private power companies say 'We are <br />going to build these lines anyway; why not <br />utilize our lines? We can, as project power <br />comes on, increase our 230 lines by multiple <br />units. The cost will be much less to the <br />Government and much less than the total com- <br />bined costs'. Now under the system proposed <br />by the private power companies, they say that <br />the combined cost to the Bureau and to them <br />would be in the neighborhood of $122,000,000 <br />as compared to the $157,000,000 proposed by <br />the Bureau of Reclamation, affecting a very <br />substantial saving of something under <br />$27,000,000. <br /> <br />Under the private system all of the <br />transmission in the States of Arizona, Utah, <br />Wyoming and New Mexico would be taken care <br />of by the private companies. Only Colorado <br />would be served by lines to be constructed <br />by the Bureau of Reclamation. Under their <br />plan the Bureau of Reclamation would con- <br />struct multiple 230 KV lines to the Four I <br />Corners country and multiple 230 KV lines <br />into Curecanti and also 230 KV lines into <br />Poncha Junction. Remember the original <br />Bureau plan proposed going into Pueblo with <br />a 345 KV line. The private companies point <br />out that they already have transmission facil- <br />ities from Poncha Junction into Pueblo and <br />then into Denver, and they are willing to <br />construct another 230 KV line from Poncha <br />Junction. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.