Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1. Fulfill as many water rights as <br />possible according to their order of priority <br />using only surface water. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />2. Fulfill as many water rights as <br />possible according to their priority using <br />both surface and ground water. <br /> <br />3. <br />rights, <br />acreage. <br /> <br />Distribute, irrespective of water <br />the most water to the irrigable <br /> <br />4. Distribute enough water to satisfy <br />crop demands giving preference to the most <br />productive land and without regard to water <br />rights. We would give class one lands, for <br />example, priority over class two. <br /> <br />Actually, the second item, the one where <br />conjunctive use of water, in other words, <br />ground water and surface water used conjunc- <br />tively, would be the one that would be of <br />the greatest interest to the group here. I <br />think it would also be of interest to show <br />these other aspects to determine whether or <br />not there is likely to be substantial im- <br />provement by some other management scheme. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />At the moment our program on this is <br />to design a simple model that shows what <br />would happen between two points of diversion <br />due to conjunctive use of ground and surface <br />water. With or without the digital model we <br />could make these simple kinds of calculations <br />and be able then, if we had a pilot project <br />where water management plans were being con- <br />ducted, to test these to predict the outcome <br />and hopefully improve the distribution of <br />water throughout the system. <br /> <br />Our intent in this particular method is <br />to make it applicable both to the Arkansas <br />and to the South Platte River and in some <br />modified form eventually to the San Luis <br />Valley or any other valley within the state. <br />We chose to start our modeling in the <br />