My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00326
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00326
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:48:39 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:35:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/19/1977
Description
Agenda, Minutes, Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />going back to the river: from Fruita west that could be used to put <br />some -- ! don't know. . :.. : <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />J <br />Ed Currier says ten tbousand. resay, including up in-Utah, up to . <br />twenty thousand acres in cultivation, and one of the legislators in our <br />area said you're going to get more salinity, but if you put that under <br />Thompson center-pivot sprinkler, you're not going. to pay the power bill <br />to run that u~derground.: <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: May I suggest to you that maybe you discuss this with <br />the staff and Mr. Sparks and formulate it? I don't know what the <br />federal government may be doing. Obviously,:we've got to coordinate <br />that. <br /> <br />If you wouldn't mind discussing.it with Mr. Sparks, and obviously itis a <br />matter of great concern to him and I just.want to coordinate what's _ <br />going on that r'm not aware of and see what we can work out. <br /> <br />MR. BAER:- All. right, sir.' Thank you. !don't think they're doing too <br />much on the salinity thing.. I think they're dragging: their feet and <br />they're going to-study it.to death.: They're going t6:do that until <br />Central Arizona diverts the water, and maybe you can jac~ them up again <br />like you did last summer or fall. <br />~ ' ..) ... <br />MR. STAPLETON: Thank you.: <br /> <br />MR. FETCHER: Let's go back briefly to the projects that have been <br />recommended by the Conservation-Board, or are we of~ of that subject <br />now officially? <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: We're never cast in concrete. <br />discuss? <br /> <br />What would you like to <br /> <br />MR. FETCHER: .r'd like to know from Larry what the status of these <br />projects is as far as the legislature is_ concerned.andwhat our chances <br />are of having a certain number of them recommended, or perhaps all of <br />them recommended. <br /> <br />My colleague on the right here indicates that the Governor is only <br />supporting three of them, and this alarms me. <br /> <br />MR, STAPLETON: you're t~lking now about the construction fund? <br /> <br />MR. FETCHER:. Right. <br />MR. STAPLETON:- Any comlllEmt on that? <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: Your guess is about as good as mine, Mr. Fetcher. You <br />have a copy.of the, letter that we sent. to the speaker of the House and <br />to the president of the Senate setting forth the Board's tentative. <br />recommendations. That report was rendered in response to a specific <br />statutory :duty imposed upon us to:make an annual;~eport on the status of <br />the fund to the General Assembly. <br /> <br />-29- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.