My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00326
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00326
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:48:39 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:35:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/19/1977
Description
Agenda, Minutes, Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />we could think of.: If you weight one factor.too heavily, then that <br />factor becomes vredomina1J.t and there's no point in looking at the- <br />others. We don t solicit these projects. They submit applications to <br />us. Pueblo-is-perfectly free to submit an application to us along with <br />anyone else. We are not excluding anybody, but unl:ess. they ,make appli- <br />cation, . we ca~' t cons.ider unknown projects. We've: got more work. than <br />we can do now. -We don't give preference to any agency. If they submit <br />an application, we'll look it over. . - - : ~: <br /> <br />We may:tell I'l1:eblo we think: politically. we can't .get .them ten million: <br />dollars or .whatever; or that we think they can take care of their own <br />nee~s, but 'no one is excluded from the use of this fund. <br /> <br />MR.::JACKSON:: Mr. Chairman, I'm-sorry I mentiou'ed Pueblo. It wasnit;;' <br />parochial request. I simply aside from quarreling with how you did <br />these p~rtic4lar standards, and like John I would like.to know more <br />about them -~aside from quarreling with how you made a decision between <br />Dove Creek and Trinchera anct perhaps Pueblo. I think we need to have a <br />base standa~d of whether we. will consider any proj~ct that is applied. <br />for to: ~he: Board, and that: is t~e essence of:my. request, Mr. Chairman, <br />which I :think, you understand. . . - <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: Yes. Any further comments? All right. It's been <br />regularly moved and seconded that. the pri:oritie-s as recounnendedby <br />Mr. Vandemoer be accepted which.moved Rico and Keenesburg up to fifth <br />and sixth and then continued the prior.ities.as set forth on thee previous <br />schedule. <br /> <br />. . <br />All those in favor signify by saying aye. (Unanimous ayes.} <br />(No respo.11se.)-: The priorities are unanimously accepted. <br /> <br />Opposed? <br /> <br />. - ~ <br />Is there any other unfinished business before the Board?- <br /> <br />.. . <br />MR. SHE-RMAN: Mr. Ch.airman, one :minor point. 'I would urge -the Board <br />I'm sure Larry intends to. do this -,: to let the legislature. know the <br />revised priority. list as soon as .possible because they will ~e~ taking <br />~tion. . <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS : There will be committee hearings on these projects in the <br />near future. When I appear before those committees, I will advise them <br />of the schedule. : C <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON:J All right. . Is there any other .unfinished business.? <br />Mr. Baer? - - - <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />- <br />MR. BAER.:Mr.Chairman, I'd like to make a proposal, but I don"t know. <br />if this is a proper time to legislate for another study~ : <br /> <br />MR. STA~ETON:- Mr. B~er, I know. you very: well, but would you mind. ioing <br />to. the mi~rophone and putting your name in the record, and then you reo <br />free to express your views. . : . <br /> <br />- <br />. ~ <br />MR. BAER: : Thank- you~ Mr.)Chairman.. r.'m T.. J.: Baer:froin Loma.,-and no <br />one knows where. Loma is at because they don.' t know. = There's a few or <br /> <br />-27- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.