My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00320
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00320
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:48:32 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:35:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/21/2006
Description
WSP Section - Colorado River Update on 7-State Proposal to Reclamation
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Agenda Item 6 <br />March 21-22 Board Meeting <br />Page 4 of5 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Interim Surplus Guidelines (ISG) that expanded the range of "normal operation" by <br />eliminating the "partial domestic surplus" step and capped a "domestic surplus" at <br />450,000 AF. <br /> <br />The computer modeling that was done to develop these criteria relied on Reclamation's <br />CRSS program using the current Upper Basin depletion schedule (6,0 MAF) and the <br />current 602(a) storage algorithm, which determines the storage required to protect current <br />Upper Basin depletions and reservoir power pools during the critical drought period. The <br />Upper Basin was insistent on these modeling parameters, which Arizona in particular <br />objected to. The "2025 termination unless renewed" provision associated with the <br />coordinated Powell-Mead operations proposal is the principal reason that the 7 -states <br />allowed the proposed coordinated operations to move forward. Reclamation, with <br />assistance from the 7 -state technical workgroup, as indicated that they will prepare a <br />report that documents the modeling runs and results used to develop the proposed <br />operations plan, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The recommendations in the proposed 7-state agreement address system efficiency, <br />extraordinary conservation and augmentation projects. Svstem efficiencv projects are <br />those projects that conserve, or salvage, water that is being lost to the Colorado River <br />System where there is not a Section 5 Boulder Canyon Project Act water service contract <br />associated with the use of the water that is being lost. An example of such a project is the <br />conservation, or salvage, of water that is currently flowing to Mexico, that is above the <br />United States' delivery requirement to Mexico in accordance with the 1944 Mexican <br />Water Treaty. Extraordinarv conservation proiects are associated with the conservation <br />of water that is being lost to the Colorado River System where there is a Section 5 <br />Boulder Canyon Project Act water service contract associated with the use of the water <br />that is being lost. An example of an extraordinary conservation project is the fallowing <br />of a parcel of land within an irrigation district that has had a history of use. Augmentation <br />proiects are projects, such as weather modification and desalination that provide <br />additional water for use within the Colorado River System. <br /> <br />The Basin states have proposed that the Secretary develop a policy and accounting <br />procedure that allows water that is conserved through extraordinary conservation <br />measures or efficiency projects or that is imported into the Colorado River System from <br />non-Colorado River sources to be transferred under certain conditions to the project <br />beneficiary through Articles II(B)(2) and II(B)(6) of the 1964 Decree in Arizona v. <br />California. The Basin states have suggested an accounting mechanism that allows this to <br />occur through the concept of creating "Intentionally Created Surplus" (ICS) credits, The <br />ICS pool in Lake Mead would be limited to a combined total of2.l MAF at any time. <br />All ICS water would be reduced by 5% in order to provide a benefit to the system as a <br />whole. IeS water would be subject to upto a 3% evaporation charge as well and subject <br />to spill under certain storage conditions in Lake Mead. In a specific year through <br />forbearance agreements, these ICS credits could be used by the Section 5 contractor in <br />addition to the water that was apportioned to the contractor. <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.