My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00277
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00277
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:48:07 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:34:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/11/1970
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes, Memos
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />a potential participating project. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />As a result then, the Yellow Jacket Water <br />Conservancy District was formed. They organized <br />under the state laws in accordance with the <br />policy set by the Colorado Water Conservation <br />Board to establish conservancy districts for <br />the support and development of the projects <br />that the local people wanted. The Yellow <br />Jacket District and the Colorado River water <br />Conservation District contacted the Bureau of <br />Reclamation and requested that we initiate <br />detailed feasibility investigations on the <br />project. We started these detailed studies in <br />1961 and came up with what we thought was a <br />better plan than the old reconnaissance plan. <br /> <br />When we started these investigations we <br />started our cooperative planning and negotia- <br />tions with the Bureau of Sport Fisheries and <br />Wildlife, the Forest Service, Bureau of Out- <br />door Recreation and the State Game, Fish and <br />Parks Commission. As a result of this coop- <br />erative planning they recommended that we not <br />enlarge Trappers Lake. Trappers Lake is a <br />famous native water for native cut throat <br />trout spawning. It is also right on the edge <br />of the wilderness area. We were all in agree- <br />ment that it would not be good to enlarge <br />Trappers Lake because of the value of it the <br />way it is today. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The next recommendation that was made at <br />that time was the water that would be bypassed <br />at the Yellow Jacket canal diversion, down here <br />on the North Fork of the White River right <br />about Buford. They recommended that we maintain <br />minimum flows of 70 cfs in the stream below the <br />diversion dam during the summer and 30 cfs in <br />the winter or the natural streamflow, whichever <br />was less. We started on that basis: then as <br />we got farther along in the planning those <br />minimum flows were increased and we gave <br />further consideration to those. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.