My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00277
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00277
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:48:07 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:34:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/11/1970
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes, Memos
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />this plan for the piceance Basin area for <br />minerals, oil shale and coal development <br />that are being contemplated there. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />As I mentioned, we continued working with <br />the Forest Service, Bureau of Sport Fisheries <br />and Wildlife and the Bureau of Outdoor Recrea- <br />tion. As a result of this, they gave us <br />several recommendations which we have tried to <br />work into the plan. Here is a list of the <br />recommendations that we have received from <br />those agencies. We'll go down through each <br />one of them and explain how we have met them. <br /> <br />First, as I mentioned before, they recom- <br />mended not using Trappers Lake as a source of <br />storage. So we cut that out; we eliminated <br />Trappers Lake plan and added Ripple Reservoir <br />and Lost Park Reservoir to replace the storage <br />from Trappers Lake. <br /> <br />Second, to provide a minimum conservation <br />pool in Ripple Reservoir of 3,000 acre-feet <br />for recreation and fishery purposes. This we <br />did. We have a capacity now of 3,000 acre- <br />feet of permanent pool in the bottom and 17,000 <br />acre-feet of active capacity on top for down- <br />stream purposes. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />On the Lost Park Reservoir they recommended <br />we include 2,500 acre-feet of dead and inactive <br />capacity in that for recreation and fisheries. <br />This is the Lost Park Reservoir site. There <br />are no roads into it now but it is a little <br />basin on Lost Creek and would make a very good <br />reservoir site except it is very short of water. <br />So our plan provides for bringing feeder canals <br />in from the head of the Williams Fork of the <br />Yampa River to help fill this reservoir. So <br />we provided 2,500 acre-feet of inactive con- <br />servation pool in this reservoir. <br /> <br />On the Thornburg Reservoir site, as I <br />mentioned, we reduced that in size. They <br />recommended 6,000 acre-feet of dead storage <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.