Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />. <br /> <br />making them available over the Internet in a continuing effort make reports and data readily available and <br />.further the science of weather modification in the Nation, <br />Weather Modification Association: The CWCB has joined the Weather Modification <br />Association as an affiliate member that is a professional group of meteorologists, government regulators, <br />scientists and the operational community. CWCB staff attended and reported on Colorado at the NAIWC <br />meeting South Dakota in April 2003, The CWCB was invited to participate as a voting member of the <br />Council in future meetings. The CWCB hopes to attend the next NAIWC meeting as a voting member <br />but the dues around $5,000 per year far exceed any current capability to participate, <br />North American Interstate Weather Modification Council: Based on funding and guidance <br />from the CWCB Board the CWCB should consider joining the NAIWC, The NAIWC meets twice a year <br />and is comprised of western program regulators. Staff believes that this is a fonun to coordinate western <br />U.S. efforts and is a link between water managers, the meteorological, and scientific community. <br />Severance Tax Operational Account grant project: The CWCB has a $25,000 severance tax <br />grant application for Fiscal year 2004 for a project entitled "Feasibility of Wintertime Orographic <br />Precipitation Enhancement in Colorado's Watersheds", Most of this project idea came from John Henz of <br />HDR Engineering and is designed to answer the questions, if you wanted to cloud seed in your watershed <br />what does the storm data tell you from the last 30 years (I 972-2002)? And is this appropriate technology <br />for all of the watersheds in Colorado or specifically which ones will it work well in? <br />GIS and web map project: With the advent of collected fees staff set out to make more reporting <br />and basic information about the projects more readily available, The project has GJ.S, maps of all the <br />states wintertime operations and makes the SNOTEL and Snowcourse information in the target areas <br />available through links on the website. This project started with data assembled by the Denver Water <br />GJ.S. coordinator and expanded it to include all of the states programs. Once completed this summer, the <br />permits, reports and target area and generator location maps will be available on the CWCB website. <br />. USBR grant proposal: The CWCB is working with Western Weather Consultants, Colorado <br />State University, and Curt Hartzel a retired USBR meteorologist to develop a proposal and apply for <br />federal grant funds from the USBR - Weather Modification Damage Fund, This project hopes to use <br />numerical modeling and physical measurements during an operational season to further quantify the <br />positive snowfall effects from cloud seeding, Last year three of eight proposals were funded due to <br />limited funding and competition by the Bureau's 17 western states, It is anticipated that $800,000 will be <br />available through the competitive grant process, RFP's are due in August 2003 with the funds awarded in <br />October 2003. <br />Cooperative Programs: The Gunnison County program operated by Don Griffith of North <br />American Weather Consultants out of Sandy, Utah and Gunnison County Manager John Devore <br />convinced almost all local water interests of the benefits from seeding and put together a program that <br />includes nearly all the water users in the county. It is anticipated that another program and permit <br />encompassing the southwest part of the Gunnison County and parts of Hinsdale and Saguache County, <br />State Spending Authority: There is no annual appropriation for the weather modification <br />program, There is only spending authority for up to $7,100 that can be collected from fees from <br />commercial projects. A DNR decision item this year is to increase spending authority to $20,000 per <br />year that should allow the CWCB to collect the full 2% commercial fees from programs for the next few <br />years. However, the fees collected in 2002-2003 were approximately $13,000 and are insufficient to <br />complete expand the program from the current level. <br />Summary: Controversy in this program is no doubt prevalent and iron clad scientific and <br />operational data needs to be improved. But at the heart of these efforts is the only really way to truly <br />increase water supply. Joe Busto of the CWCB staff believes that cloud seeding is not the answer to water <br />. problems but a piece of the puzzle and may prove useful as general augmentation and for drought <br />preparedness in years before future forecasted droughts, It may be beneficial to meet water users needs <br />and also may benefit our state programs like Stream Restoration, Stream and Lake Protection, <br />Conservation and Drought Planning, and Water Supply Protection, Many other western states, for lack <br />3 <br />