My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00261
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00261
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:47:58 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:34:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/13/1964
Description
Table of Contents, Agenda, Minutes and Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />3886 <br /> <br />MR. JOHNSON: <br /> <br />MR. PETERSON: <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />MR. Me CANDLESS: <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />MR. KROEGER: <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />MR. KROEGER: <br /> <br />"Do you have a motion in mind?" <br /> <br />"I haven't worked one up. I think we <br />should discuss some of these other projects. <br />I'm not ready to make a motion to cover all <br />of these projects because there may be others <br />that may be interested in changing them <br />around. But I would move at this time that <br />the Juniper and Great Northern Projects be <br />combined in one feasibility investigation and <br />that this project - the combined project - be <br />given the priority #2 on the list." <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />"You have heard the motion. Is there a <br />second to the motion?" <br /> <br />II Second. 11 <br /> <br />"Any further discussion on the motion? <br />All those in favor will signify by saying 'aye'; <br />opposed - unanimously carried. <br /> <br />I think the next matter to be considered <br />is a motion to adopt the priority schedule <br />as set forth in ~oc. Sparks' March 2nd memo- <br />randum with the Juniper Project as combined <br />with the Great Northern project being #2 <br />priori ty." <br /> <br />"Mr. Chairman." <br /> <br />"Mr. Kroeger.: <br /> <br />"Mr. Chairman, I'd like to call to the <br />Board's attention that there are other areas <br />within the state that have been neglected much <br />in the same manner as the Yampa-White area and <br />one of these particular regions is the Archu- <br />leta County, or the upper region of the San <br />Juan River. Much development has occurred <br />in the San Juan River but none on the head- <br />waters where the water originates. Some <br />years ago the O'Neal Park Project was consid- <br />ered and barely missed feasibility. I would <br />like to suggest at this time that the Board, <br />in considering priorities, also include in <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.